other threats, it would be better to have fewer fake identifications in circulation and more respectfor the law. The minimum legal drinking age of twenty-one (MLDA 21) enforcement is not apriority for many law enforcement agencies. Police are inclined to ignore or under-enforceMLDA 21 because of resource limitations, statutory obstacles, perceptions that punishments areinadequate, and the time and effort required for processing and paperwork. An estimated two ofevery 1,000 occasions of illegal drinking by youth under twenty-one results in an arrest.Lowering the minimum legal drinking age of twenty-one would reduce the number of underagepeople who are hurt from alcohol-related injuries or accidents due to fear of legal consequencesif they sought medical attention.State governments should have the right to establish a lower legal drinking age thatreflects their unique demographics, legal context, and history. The Uniform Drinking Act, whichcompelled states to set the legal drinking age at twenty-one by withholding ten percent ofhighway funding from states that kept the minimum legal drinking age at eighteen, is an exampleof federal government overreach into state affairs. Many states that were happy with theirminimum legal drinking age at eighteen bowed to federal pressure rather than lose millions inannual highway funds. This is a strong point which proves that it is in fact alright to allow theeighteen year olds to drink at this age rather than twenty-one; our citizens of this age group werealready being allowed to drink but were suddenly restrained from such action all because thestates boweed to the federal law in order to receive funding for their state highways.
Cordero 5Although with all that has been presented many oppose of the lowering of the legaldrinking age can interfere with development of the young adult brain's frontal lobes, essential forfunctions such as emotional regulation, planning, and organization. When alcohol consumptioninterferes with this early adult brain development, the potential for chronic problems such asgreater vulnerability to addiction, dangerous risk-taking behavior, reduced decision-makingability, memory loss, depression, violence, and suicide is greater. Many rights in the UnitedStates are conferred on citizens at age twenty-one or older. A person cannot legally purchase ahandgun nor gamble in a casino in most states. Notice how it is said that most states do not allowthis; certain states do allow eighteen year olds to purchase guns and ammunition so why aren’tthey allowed to have a mere beverage? Until the age of twenty-one individuals may be able toadopt a child, rent a car for most companies at age twenty-five, or run for President until agethirty-five. Drinking should be similarly restricted due to the responsibility required to self andothers. The ages provide are what the society, the United States of America people, consider tobe mature and responsible enough regarding the age group. Albeit not everyone may agree uponthese ages they are part of the federal law that must be followed in this particular country.