Seaquist g 2012 business law for managers san diego

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

Seaquist, G. (2012). Business law for managers . San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc
Review the “ AT&T Pulls $39 Billion T-Mobile Bid on Regulatory Opposition " article. In 2011, AT&T attempted a merger with T-Mobile. The Justice Department sued under the act, claiming that the merger would constitute a violation of the antitrust laws. In 2012, AT&T dropped its attempt at the acquisition. If AT&T had merged with T-Mobile, would the merger have violated antitrust laws? Why, or why not? Do not be unduly influenced by the Justice Department’s stance on the issue. Use your own analysis to reach a conclusion. In the United States, according to Seaquist (2012), “it is a felony to monopolize or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations” (pg. 31.2). This is what makes our country great when it comes to free commerce and enterprise. AT&T making the attempt to purchase T- Mobile was an ambition business choice. This acquisition is in clear violation of antitrust laws in the United States and here is why. There are not many major cell phone players in the United States. The four most prominent ones are Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint. AT&T deciding to purchase T-Mobile, according to Moritz (2011), “this deal would have added T-Mobile’s 33.7 million customers to AT&T’s 100.7 million subscribers, surpassing Verizon Wireless’s 107.7 million” (pg.1). This

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture