Could easily justify that murder is morally

could easily justify that murder is morally acceptable while another believes that
murder is morally corrupt. We could theoretically become a lawless world, merely
because not everyone would agree on the concept of morality. Jibben also goes on to
say that without moral absolutes, “people would not feel this universal injustice at the
suffering of the innocent”, meaning that there “must be a standard of right and
wrong”, and because of this, there “must be a standard giver.”

References:
Jibben, J. (2015). The wisdom of absolutes. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), The beginning of
wisdom: An introduction to Christian thought and life (2nd ed.). Available from
-
wisdom_an-introduction-to-christian-thought-and-life_ebook_2e.php
Lamca, C. (2015). Intellectual obstacles to wisdom. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), The
beginning of wisdom: An introduction to Christian thought and life (2 nd ed.). Available from
-
wisdom_an-introduction-to-christian-thought-and-life_ebook_2e.php
Sharpe, J. (2015). Experiential obstacles to wisdom. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), The
beginning of wisdom: An introduction to Christian thought and life (2 nd ed.). Available from
-
wisdom_an-introduction-to-christian-thought-and-life_ebook_2e.php
Topic 6 Overview. (2017). CWV-101: Christian Worldview. Phoenix, AZ: Grand Canyon
University.