presented in the source is clearly developed Mark 64 Evidence is specific and

Presented in the source is clearly developed mark 64

This preview shows page 83 - 85 out of 88 pages.

presented in the source is clearly developed. Mark = 6.4 Evidence is specific and purposeful. Evidence may contain some minor errors. A capable and adept discussion of evidence reveals a solid understanding of social studies knowledge and its application to the assignment. Mark=6.4 The writing is clear and purposefully organized. Control of syntax, mechanics, and grammar is capable. Vocabulary is appropriate and specific. Minor errors in language do not impede communication. Mark = 6.4
Image of page 83
Unit 6: Economic Systems and Liberalism Perspectives on Ideology 76 ADLC Social Studies 30-1 Satisfactory S Analysis of the source is straightforward and conventional; a generalized understanding of the ideological perspective (s) is demonstrated. Relationship among title, image and quotation is capable and purposeful. Mark = 4.8 The position established is generally supported by appropriately chosen and developed argument(s). The argumentation is straightforward and conventional, demonstrating an adequate understanding of the assignment. The relationship between the position taken, argumentation, and the ideological perspective presented in the source is generally developed. Mark = 4.8 Evidence is conventional and straightforward. The evidence may contain minor errors and a mixture of relevant and extraneous information. A generalized and basic discussion reveals an acceptable understanding of social studies knowledge and its application to the assignment. Mark=4.8 The writing is straightforward and functionally organized. Control of syntax, mechanics, and grammar is adequate. Vocabulary is conventional and generalized. There may be occasional lapses in control and minor errors; however, the communication remains generally clear. Mark=4.8 Limited L Analysis of the source is incomplete or lacks depth; a confused understanding of the ideological perspective(s) is demonstrated. Relationship among title, image and quotation is superficial, incomplete, redundant and of questionable accuracy. Mark = 2.4 The position established is confusing and largely unrelated to the argument(s). The argumentation is repetitive, contradictory, simplistic, and based on uninformed belief. The relationship between the position taken, argumentation, and the ideological perspective presented in the source is superficially developed. Mark = 3.2 Evidence is potentially relevant but is unfocused and incompletely developed. The evidence contains inaccuracies and extraneous detail. The discussion reveals a superficial and confused understanding of social studies knowledge and its application to the assignment. Mark=3.2 The writing is unclear and disorganized. Control of syntax, mechanics, and grammar is lacking. Vocabulary is overgeneralized and inaccurate. Jarring errors impede communication.
Image of page 84
Image of page 85

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 88 pages?

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture