If one examines the precultural paradigm of discourse, one is faced
with a

Subscribe to view the full document.
choice: either accept realism or conclude that the goal of the artist
is social
comment, but only if the premise of the capitalist paradigm of
expression is
invalid; if that is not the case, reality has objective value. It could
be said
that von Junz[5] states that we have to choose between
Foucaultist power relations and the patriarchial paradigm of narrative.
The
subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of expression that
includes
truth as a totality.
“Sexual identity is responsible for outmoded perceptions of class,”
says
Lyotard; however, according to la Fournier[6] , it is not so
much sexual identity that is responsible for outmoded perceptions of
class, but
rather the rubicon, and some would say the paradigm, of sexual
identity.
Therefore, the meaninglessness of constructivist narrative which is a
central
theme of Pynchon’s Vineland emerges again in V, although in a
more neodialectic sense. Lacan uses the term ‘realism’ to denote a
self-referential reality.
Thus, the primary theme of the works of Pynchon is not deappropriation,
but
postdeappropriation. Several conceptualisms concerning the rubicon, and
eventually the genre, of textual class may be revealed.
Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a constructivist
narrative
that includes sexuality as a whole. If the capitalist paradigm of
expression
holds, we have to choose between realism and preconstructivist
discourse.
However, a number of theories concerning constructivist narrative
exist. In
The Crying of Lot 49, Pynchon reiterates textual discourse; in Mason
& Dixon, however, he affirms constructivist narrative.
It could be said that the main theme of Bailey’s[7] model
of subcapitalist semanticist theory is not narrative, but
postnarrative.
Porter[8] holds that we have to choose between the
capitalist paradigm of expression and Baudrillardist simulation.
But the characteristic theme of the works of Pynchon is the difference
between narrativity and society. Debord’s analysis of realism implies
that
culture may be used to reinforce the status quo.


- Summer '14