60%(5)3 out of 5 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 263 - 265 out of 368 pages.
aw.Arnold is in an automobile accident caused by Roberta's negligence. He accepts her offer to pay him $1,000 and agrees to release her from any further liability. Later, he discovers that his injuries are worse than he had suspected. Arnold's acceptance of Roberta's offer willax.a. enable him to to recover for injuries ay.b.not allow him to sue Robertaaz.c. enable him to sue roberta to recover for the other injuriesba.d. none - b.not allow him to sue Robertabb.Assume that Larry buys farmland from Al, an apple farmer, because Al states that the land would be a prime site for high-density housing. If Larry subsequently finds out that the local zoning laws permit that land to be used only for agricultural purposes, then bc.a. Larry may rescind the contract and recover his money.bd.b. Larry may rescind the contract only if he can demonstrate thatAl knew about the zoning restrictions.be.c. Larry cannot rescind the contract.bf.d. None of the above. - c. Larry cannot rescind the contract.bg.Bill Cratchett leased an apartment from Grendel. Cratchett was aperson of limited means in a locality where low-income housing was
scarce. Shortly after signing the agreement, he fell in an unlit stairwell when a step unexpectedly gave way. In a suit for damages Grendel relied on a clause in the lease stating, "Tenant agrees to hold Owner harmless form any claims for damages no matter how caused." Cratchett shouldbh.a. Win because the exculpatory clause was unenforceable as a violation of public policybi.b. Win because the lease was a contract to adhesionbj.c. Lose because nothing indicates that the lease was unconscionable as a wholebk.d. Lose because exculpatory clauses are usually upheld in the interest of freedom of contract - a. Win because the exculpatory clausewas unenforceable as a violation of public policybl.Bill has been trying to purchase Mary's farm for some time, but Mary has been reluctant to sell. Once evening Mary said to Bill, "Okay, I'll sell." Bill replied, "Thank you, Mary. I accept." This agreement was not reduced to writing, but Bill and Mary did shake hands. Two days later, Bill sent a letter to Mary outlining the terms of the agreement and stating that he would deliver cash within 10 days. The letter was signed, "Best regards, Bill." Later, Bill has second thoughts, and refusesto go through with the purchase. Marybm.a. Could enforce the contract against Bill because the Statue of Frauds has been met in this instancebn.b. Could not enforce the contract against Bill because his signature on the letter was inadequate under that Statue of Frauds.bo.c. Could not enforce the contract against Bill because she did notsign the letter.bp.d. In this instance, neither Mary nor Bill could enforce the contract. - a. Could enforce the contract against Bill because the Statueof Frauds has been met in this instancebq.Carson agreed orally to repair lve's rare book for $450. Before the work was started, lve asked Carson to perform additional repairs tothe book and agreed to increase the contract price to $650. After Carson completed the work, lve refused to pay and Carson sued. lve's