Immune from prosecution in the state they are working

- immune from prosecution in the state they are working
- do not pay taxes
- premises are protected
AA 41
respect laws. when diplomats do wrong things in the countries they work in, they
become persona non-grata (falling out of grace)

POLI 4020: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Question
1
Complete
7.00 points out of 7.00
Flag question
Question text
Matching
Williamson v. Lee Optical (1955)
Answer 1Choose...McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)An
exception to the rule that since 1937,
Congressional legislation based on the interstate
commerce clause has generally been
upheld.Interpreted Fourteenth Amendment
(liberty) more narrowly, and police powers more
broadly.Ruled that state laws regulating business
need only demonstrate a rational argument for
exercising such regulations as part of their police
powers.Earliest case to interpret "commerce";
ruled that "commerce" covers not just goods
traded across state borders.Involved a clash
between states rights (to pass personal liberty
laws) and the Fugitive Slave Act (based on the
Fugitive Slave Clause)Narrowed interpretation of
economic liberty under 14th; broadened definition
of interstate commerce
West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937)
(case about a state law that
Answer 2Choose...McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)An
exception to the rule that since 1937,

regulated minimum wage)
Congressional legislation based on the interstate
commerce clause has generally been
upheld.Interpreted Fourteenth Amendment
(liberty) more narrowly, and police powers more
broadly.Ruled that state laws regulating business
need only demonstrate a rational argument for
exercising such regulations as part of their police
powers.Earliest case to interpret "commerce";
ruled that "commerce" covers not just goods
traded across state borders.Involved a clash
between states rights (to pass personal liberty
laws) and the Fugitive Slave Act (based on the
Fugitive Slave Clause)Narrowed interpretation of
economic liberty under 14th; broadened definition
of interstate commerce
Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842)
Answer 3Choose...McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)An
exception to the rule that since 1937,
Congressional legislation based on the interstate
commerce clause has generally been
upheld.Interpreted Fourteenth Amendment
(liberty) more narrowly, and police powers more
broadly.Ruled that state laws regulating business
need only demonstrate a rational argument for
exercising such regulations as part of their police
powers.Earliest case to interpret "commerce";
ruled that "commerce" covers not just goods
traded across state borders.Involved a clash
between states rights (to pass personal liberty
laws) and the Fugitive Slave Act (based on the
Fugitive Slave Clause)Narrowed interpretation of
economic liberty under 14th; broadened definition
of interstate commerce
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Answer 4Choose...McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)An
exception to the rule that since 1937,
Congressional legislation based on the interstate
commerce clause has generally been
upheld.Interpreted Fourteenth Amendment
(liberty) more narrowly, and police powers more
broadly.Ruled that state laws regulating business