10 consists of the units on hand january 1 and the

Info icon This preview shows pages 24–26. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
10 consists of the units on hand January 1 and the units purchased April 15 and August 24. Illustration 6A-2 shows the inventory under a FIFO method perpetual system. Balance Date Purchases Cost of Goods Sold (in units and cost) January 1 (100 @ $10) $ 1,000 April 15 (200 @ $11) $2,200 (100 @ $10) (200 @ $11) $ 3,200 August 24 (300 @ $12) $3,600 (100 @ $10) (200 @ $11) $ 6,800 (300 @ $12) September 10 (100 @ $10) (200 @ $11) (250 @ $12) ( 50 @ $12) $ 600 $6,200 November 27 (400 @ $13) $5,200 ( 50 @ $12) $5,800 (400 @ $13) Illustration 6A-2 Perpetual system—FIFO Cost of goods sold The ending inventory in this situation is $5,800, and the cost of goods sold is $6,200 [(100 @ $10) H11001 (200 @ $11) H11001 (250 @ $12)]. Compare Illustrations 6-5 (page 256) and 6A-2.You can see that the results un- der FIFO in a perpetual system are the same as in a periodic system . In both cases, the ending inventory is $5,800 and cost of goods sold is $6,200. Regardless of the system, the first costs in are the costs assigned to cost of goods sold. Ending inventory PDF Watermark Remover DEMO : Purchase from to remove the watermark
Image of page 24

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
272 Chapter 6 Inventories Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) Under the LIFO method using a perpetual system, the company charges to cost of goods sold the cost of the most recent purchase prior to sale.Therefore, the cost of the goods sold on September 10 consists of all the units from the August 24 and April 15 purchases plus 50 of the units in beginning inventory. Illustration 6A-3 shows the computation of the ending inventory under the LIFO method. Balance Date Purchases Cost of Goods Sold (in units and cost) January 1 (100 @ $10) $1,000 April 15 (200 @ $11) $2,200 (100 @ $10) $3,200 (200 @ $11) August 24 (300 @ $12) $3,600 (100 @ $10) (200 @ $11) (300 @ $12) $6,800 September 10 (300 @ $12) (200 @ $11) ( 50 @ $10) (50 @ $10) $ 500 $6,300 November 27 (400 @ $13) $5,200 (50 @ $10) $5,700 (400 @ $13) Illustration 6A-3 Perpetual system—LIFO Cost of goods sold Ending inventory The use of LIFO in a perpetual system will usually produce cost allocations that differ from those using LIFO in a periodic system. In a perpetual system, the company allocates the latest units purchased prior to each sale to cost of goods sold. In contrast, in a periodic system, the latest units purchased during the period are allocated to cost of goods sold.Thus, when a purchase is made after the last sale, the LIFO periodic system will apply this purchase to the previous sale. Compare Illustrations 6-7 (page 257) and 6A-3. Illustration 6-7 shows that the 400 units at $13 purchased on November 27 applied to the sale of 550 units on September 10. Under the LIFO perpetual system in Illustration 6A-3, the 400 units at $13 pur- chased on November 27 are all applied to the ending inventory. The ending inventory in this LIFO perpetual illustration is $5,700, and cost of goods sold is $6,300, as compared to the LIFO periodic illustration (on page 257) where the ending inventory is $5,000 and cost of goods sold is $7,000.
Image of page 25
Image of page 26
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern