P4p is the most pronounced program designed to

P4P is the most pronounced program designed to
fulfill patients' health service expectations. Since providers are exposed to incentive-based
reimbursements, there is a likelihood of a downward impact on providers' compensations.
Regardless of challenges faced in establishing value-based purchasing programs, P4P gives the
US hopes in attaining reduced cost in the healthcare system while improving service quality and
operational efficacy.

P4P 6
References
Chen, C.-C., & Cheng, S.-H. (2016, February 31). Does Pay-for-performance Benefit Patients
with Multiple Chronic Conditions? Evidence from a universal coverage health care system.
.
Kyeremanteng, K., Robidoux, R., D’Egidio, G., Fernando, S. M., & Neilipovitz, D. (2019, June
19). An Analysis of Pay-for-Performance Schemes and Their Potential Impacts on Health
Systems and Outcomes for Patients. Critical Care Research and Practice.
.
Milstein, R., & Schreyoegg, J. (2016, September 20). Pay for Performance in the Inpatient
Sector: A review of 34 P4P programs in 14 OECD countries. Health policy (Amsterdam,
Netherlands). .
Soucat, A., Dale, E., Mathauer, I., & Kutzin, J. (2017, April 13). Pay-for-Performance Debate:
Not Seeing the Forest for the Trees. Taylor & Francis.
.
Thomas, F. G., & Caldis, T. (2007). Emerging Issues of Pay-for-performance in Health Care.
Health care financing review. .
Kongstvedt, P. R. (2012). Essentials of managed health care (6th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and
Bartlett Publishers.