the view that GPP implementation in the Nigeria might be driven by each external and internal factors. After analyzing the interview reports, the following central drivers emerged: government regulatory entities, procurement and environmental professionals, the politicians, corporate organizations & the media, NGOs and civil society organization (CSO). Government regulatory entities There was a common suggestion by the key informants that Nigeria wants a statutory body to facilitate the adoption of GPP principles. Interestingly, most of the informants expressed the view that the government did not have to be compelled to establish a separate body for GPP implementation but would possibly use existing restrictive entity. However, the informants offered diverse views regarding that the restrictive institution ought to be in command of driving the agenda. The government agencies mentioned by the informants included agencies to blame for the regulation of environmental property and public procural follow in the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Specifically, the National Environmental Standards and Regulations social management Agency (NESREA), the Federal Ministry of Environment, the BPP and Office of the Head of Service were mentioned by the participants. Importantly, one informant reinforced this purpose that the main focus should not be simply on the event of a GPP policy, but emphatic the need for any of those institutions to effectively enforce the target. In his opinion, there was a proliferation of government agencies living in Nigeria and need to have to be compelled to introduce a replacement agency to handle GPP. The informant further express that as GPP was not associate absolutely new conception, he believed in the possibility that associate knowledgeable global organization agency would possibly drive the problem may be placed in one of the prevailing government parastatals. Expanding on this purpose, associate another key informant (KIM01) suggested that all totally different government parastatals would possibly begin GPP initiatives on their own within the absence of an overarching national policy on the problem. The participant further remarked that although there was no law in the Federal Republic of Nigeria that 37 | P a g e
required public officers to purchase on trial product, there are no laws that forbid them from procuring such product. He suggested that ministries would possibly set the pace by searching for inexperienced and thru their actions, positively commit GPP in the country. One implication of following the above suggestion is that it would possibly provide rise to a situation where inside the absence of a national coordinating institution, GPP will be implemented on an associate ad-hoc basis with little or no or no guiding directions or procedures. It is argued that though such associate approach would possibly encourage uptake of GPP implementation by some government agencies, a better result would be achieved inside the country is GPP implementation is directed by a national coordinating institution with printed goals, principles and objectives.
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 53 pages?
- Spring '08
- Environmentalism, Green Public Procurement, GPP