and rely on other team members for information, materials and resources needed to accomplish work
for the team.
The process of how the work gets done
The relationship between one member’s work and another member’s work to produce group
outcomes.
Task - About the relationship between a group member’s individual contribution to the
performance of the group
o
Additive Task –
sum total task
Tasks in which group performance is dependent on the sum of the performance
of individual group members.
For additive tasks, the potential performance of the group increases with group
size.
Eg.
Fundraising
– everyone’s contribution matters to total
o
Disjunctive –
best contributor matters
Tasks in which group performance is dependent on the performance of the best
group member.
The potential performance of groups doing disjunctive tasks increases with group
size.
Eg. Trivia teams – if you have someone on your team who knows
everything, it doesn’t matter who else is on the team.
o
Conjunctive –
worst contributor matters
Tasks in which group performance
is limited by the performance of the
poorest group member.
Both the potential and actual performance of conjunctive tasks would decrease
as group size increases.
Eg. Assembly line work teams – the slowest person slows
the whole team down.
o
Compensatory –
average contributor matters
Tasks in which group performance is limited by the average performance of all
group and size will vary as it depends on the composition, but in general past a
certain point as the size goes up performance should regress to the mean.
o
Process Losses
Group performance difficulties stemming from the problems of motivating and
coordinating larger groups
Process losses are caused by events that occur within the group that make it
difficult for the group to live up to its full potential.
As groups performing tasks bigger, they tend to suffer from process losses
Actual performance = potential performance – process losses
Goal
Outcome

Input-Process-Output Model
Group Input
: how does member diversity impact group processes and group outcomes?
o
Input:
Individual-level factors: member attributes, etc.
Group-level factors: group size, norms, etc.
Environmental-level factors: tasks, org resources, etc.
o
Member Attributes
Cognitive ability and Big-Five Personality: performance and group cohesion
Member diversity: surface and deep diversity
Bad: Longer group development process, More conflict and confusion,
Miscommunication, Difficulty in reaching agreements
Good: More creative and more open, Multiple perspectives, Increased
flexibility, Better problem-solving skills
Group Composition/Diversity:
Homogeneous: Simple tasks, Sequential tasks, Tasks that require
cooperation, Tasks that must be done quickly
Heterogeneous: Complex tasks, Collective tasks, Tasks that requires
creativity, Tasks that need not be done quickly
Group process


You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 33 pages?
- Spring '19
- Decision Making, process theories