ACFrOgDHVBgKb2r90fH6lmFlbWUZhOytLiFRtF3fOn-sQfc9oJvn5Rz08y8u5p5ZHBZfzIASeABbM4A-C8mbdJas8X-iI283F0Yk

50 company hazop team process drawing date section

This preview shows page 49 - 60 out of 81 pages.

50
Image of page 49

Subscribe to view the full document.

Company: HAZOP Team: Process: Drawing # Date: Section: Operation Mode: Page: of Study Node Process Parameter Guide Word Possible Causes Possible Consequences Risk Safeguards Recommendations responsibility reply date Status S L RR Possible Consequence The result of the deviation , if it occurs. Consequences may be as simple as a decrease in quality, or as complicated as an influence on process control. There are often multiple consequences to one deviation. 51
Image of page 50
Company: HAZOP Team: Process: Drawing # Date: Section: Operation Mode: Page: of Study Node Process Parameter Guide Word Possible Causes Possible Consequences Risk Safeguards Recommendations responsibility reply date Status S L RR Risk Matrix A risk ranking scheme that allows for prioritization. It forms a relative weighting of hazards based upon: S=Severity - usually a number from 1-4 based upon magnitude of catastrophe of the deviation. L=Likelihood - usually a number from 1-4, based upon perceived probability and/or recorded data supporting the probability of the deviation RR=Relative Risk the multiple result of S x L, used for relative ranking at the end of the HAZOP process. 52
Image of page 51

Subscribe to view the full document.

Number of Consequences by Severity and Likelihood (Risk Matrix) Risk Matrix example: 53
Image of page 52
HAZOP Criticality analysis 54
Image of page 53

Subscribe to view the full document.

HAZOP Criticality analysis 55
Image of page 54
Categories Probability P Cond. Probabil B Severity S Very rare 1 Very low 1 Low 1 Rare 2 Low 2 Significant 2 Likely 3 Significant 3 High 3 Frequent 4 high 4 Very high 4 56
Image of page 55

Subscribe to view the full document.

Interpretation of the values 57
Image of page 56