Facts clearly tied to PICO question Facts connected to your nursing practice 10

Facts clearly tied to pico question facts connected

This preview shows page 2 - 4 out of 7 pages.

Facts clearly tied to PICO question. Facts connected to your nursing practice . 10 - 9 points Less than three facts clearly identified from quan- titative nursing research ar- ticle. Only one fact includes re- sults or discussion sections. Facts not clearly tied to PICO question. Facts not clearly connected to your nursing practice . 8 - 3 points No facts clearly identified from the article. No facts from the results or discussion sections No attempt to connect facts from the article back to the PICO question. No attempt to connect facts from the article back to your nursing practice . 2 - 0 points Reliability paragraph for your nursing quantitative research article. (Paragraph #3) Definition of reliability offered with citation. Discussion of reliability clearly connected to data collection or measurement methods with examples from the student’s research article. Type of reliability is identified and named. Hint: This information is covered in Chapter 10. Use Table 10-1 in your textbook to identify the type of reliability of the measurement instru- ment / tool. 10 - 9 points Vague or no definition of reliability. Minimal reference to data collection or measurement methods in discussion of reliability with no reference to specific information from the student’s article. Type of reliability is not clearly identified / named. 8 - 3 points Vague statements about reliability made with no discussion of data collection or measurement methods offered. Type of reliability is not identified / named. 2 - 0 points ©2017 UTA School of Nursing Page 2 of
Image of page 2
N4325 Nursing Research Validity paragraph for your nursing quantitative research article. (Paragraph #4) Definition of validity offered with citation. Discussion of validity clearly connected to data collection, or measure- ment methods with exam- ples from the student’s re- search article. Type of validity is identified and named. Hint: This information is covered in Chapter 10. Use Table 10-1 in your textbook to identify the type of validity of the measurement instru- ment / tool. 10 - 9 points Vague or no definition of validity. Minimal reference to data collection, or measurement methods in discussion of validity with no reference to specific information from the student’s article. Type of validity is not clearly identified / named. 8 - 3 points Vague statements about validity made with no discussion of data collection or measurement methods offered. Type of validity is not identified / named. 2 - 0 points Two additional strengths or weaknesses from your nursing quantitative research article. (Paragraph #5) Two strengths or two weaknesses or one strength and one weakness are specifically identified from your nursing quantitative research article. The student choices for strengths / weaknesses must focus on the methods used by the authors for sampling, measurement methods used (ex. a questionnaire), or how the data was collected (data collection) with examples from the student’s research article.
Image of page 3
Image of page 4

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 7 pages?

  • Spring '17
  • Regina Urban
  • Nursing, PICO, UTA School of Nursing

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes