2 no they are not at least we think thats his

Info iconThis preview shows pages 5–7. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2. No, they are not. At least we think that’s his position. 3. No; there is no argument given beyond making fun of the position. 4. The entire second paragraph is sarcasm. Exercise 5-15 1. a 2. d 3. a 4. a 5. c 6. a 7. c 8. e 9. b 10. d Exercise 5-16 ▲1. The quotation marks downplay the quality of the school. 2. Euphemism (“ethnic cleansing”) 3. “Obamacare” is a combination of dysphemism and sarcasm; the rest contains three rhetorical comparisons packed into very few words. ▲4. Rhetorial definition 5. Euphemism ▲6. No rhetorical device present 7. “Internment camps” is a euphemism. ▲8. “Gaming” is a euphemism for “gambling.” 9. Rhetorical definition 10. Rhetorical definition ▲11. “Clearly” is a proof surrogate; the final phrase is hyperbole. 12. “Serious junk” is a dysphemism. 13. “Nevertheless” is a mild downplayer. ▲14. “Luddites” (those opposed to technological progress) is a rhetorical analogy; the entire passage is designed to suggest that cable and satellite TV are nearly universal in acceptance and use and to characterize in a negative light those (few?) who haven’t become subscribers. IM – 5 | 5
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Exercise 5-17 “Filling the coffers” and “bleeding dry” are dysphemisms; “whopping” functions similarly to a dysphemism here, acting to paint the difference as exceptionally large; “going over to the dark side” is a dysphemism, and so is “spineless.” “A fantasy come true” is a rhetorical way of saying they like it. “Sky-high” suggests a bit more than just “high”; “amazingly” emphasizes that the Senate made a bad mistake. Exercise 5-18 ▲1. “Japan, Inc.” is a dysphemism. 2. No device 3. Innuendo at the end of the passage ▲4. “Getting access” is a euphemism, and, in this context, so is “constituents.” We’ll bet it isn’t just any old constituent who gets the same kind of “access” as big campaign contributors. 5. “Tax scheme” is a dysphemism. ▲6. The last sentence is hyperbolic. 7. We think the last sentence is sarcasm, since the second memo actually contradicted the first one. 8. “So-called” is a downplayer; “fat cat” is a dysphemism. ▲9. (We really like this one.) “Even,” in the first sentence, is innuendo, insinuating that members of Congress are more difficult to embarrass than others. The remainder is another case of innuendo with a dash of downplaying. Although it’s a first-class example, it’s different from the usual ones. Mellinkoff makes you think that Congress merely passes a law in response to the situation. But stop and think for a moment: Aside from the odd congressional hearing or impeachment trial, all that Congress can do is pass laws! So Mellinkoff’s charge really should not be seen as belittling Congress at all.
Background image of page 6
Image of page 7
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page5 / 8

2 No they are not At least we think thats his position 3 No...

This preview shows document pages 5 - 7. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online