E As the Supreme Court of Oregon observed Haslip determined only that the

E as the supreme court of oregon observed haslip

This preview shows page 300 - 302 out of 351 pages.

(E) As the Supreme Court of Oregon observed, Haslip "determined only that the Alabama procedure, as a whole and in its net effect, did not violate the Due Process Clause." Which of the following accurately reflects the structure of the reasoning? The correct answer was: b. A, B, C, D, E. Therefore, [The Honda decision did not violate the Due Process Clause.]. References: Pay attention both to the logical operators and the use of parentheses. 3. Incorrect. You did not provide an answer. Your job is to analyze the reasoning involved in the following passage. You can do this by illustrating the logic involved. You should look for uses of logical operators such as conjunction, disjunction, negation, and conditional statements; sufficient and necessary conditions; and the analogical reasoning involved in the argument. Upon completion of your analysis, answer the question that follows. In short, Oregon has enacted legal standards confining punitive damage awards in product liability cases. These state standards are judicially enforced by means of comparatively comprehensive preverdict procedures but markedly limited postverdict review, for Oregon has elected to make fact- finding, once supporting evidence is produced, the province of the jury. . . . The Court today invalidates this choice, largely because it concludes that English and early American courts generally provided judicial review of the size of punitive damage awards. The Court's account of the relevant history is not compelling. Assume the following key: (A) Oregon has enacted legal standards confining punitive damage awards in product liability cases. (B) These state standards are judicially enforced by means of comparatively comprehensive preverdict procedures but markedly limited postverdict review, (C) for Oregon has elected to make fact-finding, once supporting evidence is produced, the province of
the jury. . . . (D) The Court today invalidates this choice. (E) it concludes that English and early American courts generally provided judicial review of the size of punitive damage awards. (F) The Court's account of the relevant history is not compelling. Which of the following accurately reflects the structure of the reasoning? The correct answer was: c. A and B and C E and F Therefore D. References: Pay attention to the logical operators and their relations to the claims. 4. Incorrect. You did not provide an answer. Your job is to analyze the reasoning involved in the following passage. You can do this by illustrating the logic involved. You should look for uses of logical operators such as conjunction, disjunction, negation, and conditional statements; sufficient and necessary conditions; and the analogical reasoning involved in the argument. Upon completion of your analysis, answer the question that follows.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture