g Web Making trust judgments on what web content to trust Science applications

G web making trust judgments on what web content to

This preview shows page 41 - 49 out of 53 pages.

Open information systems (e.g., Web) Making trust judgments on what web content to trust Science applications How new results were obtained Business practices Manufacturing processes and providers of a given product Development of Provenance Standards
Image of page 41
W3C Chartered a New Provenance Group in Sept 2009 Development of Provenance Standards 40 international members from academia and industry formed incubator group Articulate requirements for provenance Develop use cases Report on state-of-the-art work on provenance Propose on a roadmap for provenance Identifying elements of a provenance that would benefit from standardization
Image of page 42
1. Result Differences 2. Anonymous Information 3. Information Quality Assessment for Linked Data 4. Timeliness 5. Simple Trustworthiness Assessment 6. Ignoring Unreliable Data 7. Answering user queries that require semantically annotated provenance 8. Provenance in Biomedicine 9. Closure of Experimental Metadata 10. Locating Biospecimens With Sufficient Quality 11. Using process provenance for assessing the quality of Information products 12. Provenance Tracking in the Blogosphere 13. Provenance of a Tweet 14. Provenance and Private Data Use 15. Provenance of Decision Making in Emergency Response 16. Provenance of Collections vs Objects in Cultural Heritage 17. Provenance at different levels in Cultural Heritage 18. Identifying attribution and associations 19. Determining Compliance with a License 20. Documenting axiom formulation 21. Evidence for public policy 22. Evidence for engineering design 23. Fulfilling Contractual Obligations 24. Attribution for a versioned document 25. Provenance for Environmental Marine Data 26. Crosswalk Maintenance 27. Metadata Merging 28. Mapping Digital Rights 29. Computer Assisted Research 30. Handling Scientific Measurement Anomaly 31. Human-Executed Processes 32. Semantic disambiguation of data provider identity 33. Hidden Bug Development of Provenance Standards
Image of page 43
W3C Launched a Working Group for Provenance in Sept 2012 Development of Provenance Standards Specific charter to develop a standard for provenance based on the results of the Incubator Group Specific milestones Specific deliverables (documents) Provenance working group produced the W3C PROV standard in Apr 2013
Image of page 44
Describing Execution (Provenance) vs General Method (Workflow) SensorData - August2011 23 8 5 80 0 SensorData- TimePeriod SensorData- TimePeriod Metabolism - August2011 Metabolism -TimePeriod Metabolism -TimePeriod 45
Image of page 45
Workflow Systems Many workflow systems Each has different capabilities, including saving provenance 46
Image of page 46
Publishing Provenance and Workflows Hard to deposit workflows or provenance in a repository Not many repositories available Not many communities sharing repositories This will change in the future Publish workflow and/or provenance in a data repository, get a persistent identifier, and cite 47
Image of page 47
Example We took a quartzite sample ( IGSN: GMY00007W ) from the Stack of Glencoul in the Moine thrust, and cut 3 thin sections.
Image of page 48
Image of page 49

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 53 pages?

  • Fall '17
  • Data Management, Identifiers, Digital object identifier, Uniform Resource Name

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes