The panel tackled the thorny issues that arise when plea bargains become an

The panel tackled the thorny issues that arise when

This preview shows page 10 - 12 out of 39 pages.

system as prosecutors, public defenders, advocates, and researchers. The panel tackled the thorny issues that arise when plea bargains become an indispensable part of our criminal justice systemssystems that are now far too large to efficiently allow every criminally accused individual to exercise their right to a jury trial. Six years ago, in his opinion for the majority in Missouri v. Frye, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy observed that “[i]n today’s criminal justice system the negotiation of a plea bargain, rather than the unfolding of a trial, is almost always the critical point for a defendant,” and, in fact declared that plea bargaining “is not some adjunct to the criminal justice system; it is the criminal justice system.” Today, more than 95 percent of cases that resolve in a conviction are the result of plea bargains. As panelist Jenny Roberts , co-director of the Criminal Justice Clinic at American University Washington College of Law, explained, a number of factors have led to the ubiquity of plea bargains in the criminal justice system. Bail,she asserts, is the single biggest factor in guilty pleasin misdemeanor cases. Melba Pearson, a former state prosecutor in Miami-Dade County, agreed, explaining, “If you are in jail because of a cash bail you can’t pay, pleas can sound like a great alternative to losing your job, failing to pay rent, and a variety of other negative consequences.” Additionally, Roberts cited the power of prosecutors to overcharge and leverage draconian sentencing laws to make the risk of going to trial seem too great for many defendants. Combined with the sheer volume of criminal case, and misdemeanor cases in particular, which make it impractical if not impossible to try all criminal cases, and the rise of plea bargains was inevitable. She was quick to point out, however, that “the system is too large by design,” and that we can control the size and severity of our criminal justice system. If the political will existed, we could address overcriminalization and mandatory minimums, and thereby substantially scale back the size of our system. The pervasiveness of plea bargains brings with it many troubling consequences. Avis Buchanan, director of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia, noted “When you accept an early plea, you lose the chance to understand the evidence more completely. You might get a “favorable” bargain relative to what you think the charge could be, but can’t factor in what exculpatory evidence might be available.” The panel agreed that this can, and often does, lead to defendantspleading guilty to crimes for which they are not culpableor accepting lengthier sentences than they otherwise
Background image
Criminal Justice Reform 11 would have received. As with so many other features of the criminal justice system, plea bargains also have a disparate impact on people of color. A recent study revealed that prosecutors were more likely to offer charge reductions to white defendants than black defendants. According to the study’s findings, black defendants with no prior
Background image
Image of page 12

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture