Endnotes1.See Zack, Michael, An Architecture for Managing Explicated Knowledge,SloanManagement Review(forthcoming).2.Court, A. W., The Relationship Between Information & Personal Knowledge in NewProduct Development,International Journal of Information Management, vol. 17, no.2 (1997), 123–138.3.Lawton, George, Unifying Knowledge with XML,Knowledge Management, August(1999), 38–45, provides a list of companies using XML for knowledge management.4.See, for example, an argument on page 40 by Natalie Glance and her colleagues inBorghoff, Uwe, and Remo Pareschi,Information Technology for KnowledgeManagement, Springer, New York (1998).5.Borghoff et al.,Information Technology for Knowledge Management.6.Michael Zack cautioned that this must be reflected in the design of any such systemin his Sloan Paper. See Zack,An Architecture for Managing Explicated Knowledge.7.Such as positions taken by team members on issues and their arguments for thosepositions. Extensive research on this has been done by Ramesh, Balasubramaniam atthe J. Mack Robinson College of Business. See, for example, Balasubramaniam,Ramesh, and Kishore, Sengupta, Multimedia in a Design Rationale Decision SupportSystem,Decision Support Systems, vol. 15 (1995), 181–196. Follow-up work can befound in Ramesh, B., and Tiwana, A., Supporting Collaborative Process KnowledgeManagement in New Product Development Teams,Decision Support Systems(forthcoming).8.See, for example, Zack, M., Electronic Publishing: A Product Architecture Perspective,Information & Managementvol. 31 (1996), 75–86.