100%(2)2 out of 2 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 3 pages.
Participants could choose not to answer questions about gender. Future studies could examine actual support rather than just perceived support. A longitudinal study could see long term effects of support. And, research on actual interventions might be useful as well. Johnson, S. R., & Stage, F. K. (2018). Academic engagement and student success: Do high-impact practices mean higher graduation rates? Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 753-781.The purpose of the studyis to determine the relationship between 10 high-impact practices and graduation rates at four-year public colleges and universities in the United States. Is a four-year public institution utilizing AAC&U’s practices have higher four-year or six-yeargraduation rates than institutions that don’t utilize the AAC&U’s practices? (Johnson & Stage, 2018). There were multiple limitations to this study. First limitation was that quantitative analyses did not have a determination ofcausation between variables in this research. Second limitation was that the institutional variables were chosen based upon other studies. Third limitation was that post-hocanalysis which does not No participants were turned away based upon race, ethics, socioeconomic status as long as they were a first-generation. Future studies could look into college completion and administrative practices such ascampus resources, required activities that are not a part of the curriculum that is needed for academics and graduation. 1
ReferencePurpose of the studyStatement of the ProblemLimitations/ImplicationsEthical Conduct inthe StudyFuture research possibilities (e.g., how could a researcher extend the research detailed in the study)allow for the researchers to detect errors in the study. The fourth limitation is thatsurveys were done independently leading to the possibilities of the response being bias.