On real estate development enterprises human

Info icon This preview shows pages 8–12. Sign up to view the full content.

ON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES [HUMAN RESOURCES] .................................................... 197 A2. QUESTIONNAIRE ON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES [EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION] ........................................ 200 A3. QUESTIONNAIRE ON CONSUMER SATISFACTION TOWARDS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES ..................................... 202
Image of page 8

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

viii B1.QUESTIONNAIRE ON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES ............................................................................................... 204 B2-1. QUESTIONNAIRE ON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES [HUMAN RESOURCES] .................................................... 210 C. QUESTIONNAIRE ON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES ............................................................................................... 214
Image of page 9
ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Three Stages of Development of Chinese Real Estate Market ... 23 Figure 2- 2 Porter‘s Diamond Theory ............................................................ 34 Figure 2-3 The adoption frequency of competitiveness indicators in the literature (Zhang et al., 2009) ................................................................ 50 Figure 2-4 The pyramid structure of classical competitiveness evaluation approaches ............................................................................................. 53 Figure 2-5 Competitiveness indicators, criteria and attributes for assessing real estate developers in China .............................................................. 55 Figure 3-1 Survey design for the research (Zikmund,W. G.2003) ............... 62 Figure 3-3 Types of questionnaires and respondents for this study .............. 66 Figure 3-4 Details of questionnaires A1 and B2 in this study ...................... 67 Figure 4-1 Comparison of the average weight and importance weight of factors (the first level) for measuring the competitiveness of property developers in China ............................................................................... 80 Figure 4-2 Comparison of the Average Weight and Importance Weight of Criteria (the Second Level) for Measuring the Competitiveness of Property Developers in China ............................................................... 83 Figure 4-3 Comparison of the average weight and importance weight of attributes (the second & third level) under the management competency for measuring the competitiveness of property developers in China .... 86
Image of page 10

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

x Figure 4-4 Comparison of the average weight and importance weight of attributes (the second & third level) under the organizing competencies for measuring the competitiveness of property developers in China .... 87 Figure 4-5 Comparison of the average weight and importance weight of attributes (the second & third level) under the technological capabilities for measuring the competitiveness of property developers in China .... 88 Figure 4-6 Comparison of the Average Weight and Importance Weight of Attributes (the Second & Third Level) under the Financial Competencies for Measuring the Competitiveness of Property Developers in China .............................................................................. 90 Figure 4-7 Comparison of the average weight and importance weight of attributes (the second & third level) under the market share for measuring the competitiveness of property developers in China .......... 91 Figure 4-8 Comparison of the average weight and importance weight of attributes (the third level) under the social responsibility for measuring the competitiveness of property developers in China ........................... 92 Figure 4-9 Comparison of the average weight and importance weight of attributes (the third level) under the regional competitiveness for measuring the competitiveness of property developers in China .......... 93 Figure 5-1 Radar diagram representing the competitiveness factors in maximum score, expected/reasonable score, and actual score for Company A ......................................................................................... 105 Figure 5-2 Radar diagram representing the competitive attributes scores of Company A in management competency factors ................................ 110
Image of page 11
Image of page 12
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern