benefits should be carefully assessed and it should benefit to the population being studied.
Besides, it should be conducted by a trained investigator with approval from a proper ethical
committee. The protocol should address the ethical issues related to the proposed research.
It at
any stage of research, it is found that the original considerations are no longer satisfied, studies
should be discontinued [
Rid, Annette, Schmidt, Harald
, 2010].
References:
1.
Declaration of Helsinki - Current (2008) version
2.
Nicholson, RH; Crawley, FP (1999). "Revising the Declaration of Helsinki: a fresh
start".
Bulletin of medical ethics
151: 13–7.
3.
Rid, Annette; Schmidt, Harald (Spring 2010). "The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki — First
among Equals in Research Ethics?".
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
38 (1): 143–
8
4.
Levine, RJ (2000). "Some recent developments in the international guidelines on the
ethics of research involving human subjects".
Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences
918: 170–8
5.
Human D, Fluss S. The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki: Historical
and contemporary perspectives. 5th draft. WMA 2001
This
preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.
This is the end of the preview.
Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
- Winter '12
- Natasha
- Ethics , Informed consent, Helsinki, Declaration of Helsinki, Nuremberg Code
-
Click to edit the document details
