{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

275_infinite_limits

# = ∞ • lim x → p 4 f x = 0 note that if f and g

This preview shows pages 2–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ) = ∞ • lim x → p 4 f ( x ) = 0. Note that if f and g have ∞ limits at p then we cannot say anything about the limit of f ( x )- g ( x ) and f ( x ) /g ( x ) there. (It can be basically anything or it might not exist.) Polynomials and rational functions It is not hard to show that for any non-constant polynomial p ( x ) the limit of p ( x ) will be ∞ or-∞ ad x → ∞ or x → -∞ . (Eventually the main term of the polynomial will dominate, so you will need to find the limit of cx n as x → ±∞ .) For rational functions the limits at infinity can also be a real number, this will happen if the degree for the numerator is at most as big as the degree of the denominator. Example 3. Show that lim x →∞ x 2- 3 x +4 2 x 2 +4 x- 5 = 1 2 . Solution. In order to find the limit at ∞ , it is enough to evaluate the function for large values of x . If x > 0 then x 2- 3 x +4 2 x 2 +4 x- 5 = 1- 3 x + 4 x 2 2+ 4 x- 5 x 2 whenever both sides make sense. But now the numerator has a limit equal to 1 as x → ∞ and the limit of the denominator as x → ∞ is 2 so the limit of the ration is 1 2 . One can also show that if the rational function f ( x ) = p ( x ) q ( x ) is not defined at x = c (because q ( c ) = 0) then lim x → c- f ( x ) and lim x → c + f ( x ) will always exist (but might be infinite). Example 4. Show that lim x → 2- x 2 +2 x- 2 =-∞ and lim x → 2 + x 2 +2 x- 2 = ∞ ....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page2 / 3

= ∞ • lim x → p 4 f x = 0 Note that if f and g have...

This preview shows document pages 2 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online