paper about MBS

62 recently president obama signed the most

Info iconThis preview shows pages 124–126. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 62 Recently, President Obama signed the most comprehensive financial regulation since the Great Depression: the Dodd-Frank Act. What effect will it have on the market for nonconforming mortgages? The Act can be evaluated in light of the distinction between legislating the systemic risk of financial institutions and placing restrictions at the mortgage level. It is not clear at this stage how the Dodd-Frank Act will treat risky mortgages on the balance sheet in terms of systemic risk contribution. But this aside, with respect to systemic risk, the Act recognizes that systemic institutions must be subject to more stringent standards that 123 should increase with the degree of systemic risk. 63 Moreover, these prudential standards cover the likely suspects such as risk-based capital and liquidity requirements. While the devil is in the details, there is room to be skeptical. The rules will most likely end up following the latest Basel accords – we are now on Basel number 3 -- but a number of economists point to earlier Basel accords as partially responsible for the current financial crisis. 64 Perhaps, recognizing this point, the other way that the Act deals with systemic risk is to try to end too-big-to-fail institutions by setting up a resolution authority. This is clearly a step in the right direction, but the authority is most likely inadequate for this purpose. Its preference is to put the institution through a receivership process, which is not a particularly credible way to ensure that systemic liabilities will be left unprotected in a crisis. A more transparent and predictable design would be one based on the bankruptcy code, possibly restructured to deal with the financial King Kongs. 65 The Dodd-Frank Act, therefore, might be more successful at the individual asset level -- in this case, regulating nonconforming mortgages. The Act implements two major pieces of legislation on this front. The first is that, in order to align incentives better on the underwriting front, securitizers of mortgage loans must hold at least 5% of the credit risk -- i.e., they must have “skin in the game”. 66 The second route is to rely on a consumer finance protection bureau (CFPB), housed at the Fed, to monitor and create rules for the nonconforming mortgage market. While some observers worry about the potential for overreaching, at least with respect to mortgages, the CFPB is in the spirit of limiting the nonconforming mortgage market. Specifically, Title XIV of the Act, “Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act”, attempts to do this by applying minimum underwriting standards for mortgages, including: (i) prohibitions on steering incentives for mortgage brokers (i.e., payments to brokers for selling specific types of loans); (ii) restrictions on prepayment penalties; (iii) restrictions on high-cost mortgages; and (iv) a requirement that lenders make a “reasonable and good faith determination” that borrowers have a “reasonable ability to repay” the loan that they are taking out.a “reasonable ability to repay” the loan that they are taking out....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page124 / 151

62 Recently President Obama signed the most comprehensive...

This preview shows document pages 124 - 126. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online