Children, house, money, etc.
Although powerful and important, not all investments are
tangible.
Joint social networks
Time, emotions, and memories
Aspect that clearly differs from the Interdependence Model
Investment and its consequences
Need high satisfaction, low alternatives, and high
investment to enhance commitment.
Throughout the course of a relationship, the respective
levels of satisfaction, alternatives, and investments are
going to fluctuate and keep us in at different points in time.
Stay/leave behavior; More commitment yields more likely to
stay, and vice versa.
Perspective taking- Being more willing to consider issues
from the perspective of your partner.

Accommodation- We engage in behaviors to accommodate
our partner (i.e. staying in when partner is tired, choosing
different restaurants, etc.)
Derogation of alternatives (i.e. meeting someone at a party
and finding flaws in them in order to maintain commitment
to current partner)
Willingness to sacrifice
Illusions/perceived relationship superiority
In reference to global opinions
Fidelity
o
Can apply to various other aspects aside from interpersonal relationship
(i.e. job, graduate programs, dieting, etc.)
°
Stages of breakup: Pathway to dissolution
Recognition of problems
o
Tends to be gradual
o
‘
Intra
psychic’; Happens in your own head
Exposure of problems to partner
o
Dyadic process: Put cards on the table
o
Begin pulling out
o
“Too busy”, short interactions, etc.
Negotiation
o
Stay or go?
o
How will conflict be resolved?
o
“I’ll be better…”
o
What will it take to make the relationship work?
Transformation
o
Focus on self future vs. relationship future
o
Symbolic purging (e.g. song, place, photos, haircut, etc.)
o
Social phase: Seek out others

Grave-dressing
o
Account making: Creating/developing stories of how/why things ended.
Reinterpretation of past events in order to validate why the
relationship ended.
Convince self that we still have market value
Move on…
°
RECAP
Background
Macro: “Big” picture explanations for why breakup/divorce happens
Micro: Interdependence Theory/Commitment
Stages of breakup

Relationship Cognition
11/08/2012
°
Cognitive Accessibility of Commitment
Those who are in longer term relationships are able to answer questions about
their relationship more quickly than those in short-term relationships.
“Relationship thinking”
Three components of social perception
o
Characteristics of the stimuli
“Objective” features of the target and behavior; Characteristics of
what we are perceiving.
o
Characteristics of the perceiver
Ex: Refereeing an NFL game, color-blindness, etc.
Cognitive, motivational, emotional
Chronic/stable (e.g. personality)
Ex: Being a relatively “trusting” person
Temporary (e.g. mood states, current goals, etc.)
o
Characteristics of the context/situation
Cues help us interpret ambiguous events.


You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 92 pages?
- Spring '08
- Gray
- Roe v. Wade, partner