During discussions the firm agreed to all the nit

Info icon This preview shows pages 12–14. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
During discussions the firm agreed to all the NIT terms, conditions and specifications. 2. M/s ABB Ltd. - The firm agreed most of the NIT terms, conditions & specifications but did not agree for the following clauses i) Front width of the panel - The firm had offered front width of the panel as 950 mm against 800 mm width of the panel as per NIT. ii) Integral Earthing The firm offered separate earthing trucks against integral earthing. 3. M/s Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. i) Front width of the panel - The firm had offered front width of the panel as 1015 mm against 800 mm width of the panel as per NIT. ii) Integral Earthing - The firm offered separate earthing trucks for cable and bus bar earthing against integral earthing. iii) The firm had not submitted complete test reports along with their offer as per NIT clause. The firm submitted the type test results of their switchgears at 13.1 KA capacity as against required capacity of 18.4 KA. Both these firms M/s ABB Ltd. & M/s Kirlosar Electric Co. Ltd. Were requested & persuaded to accept all the NIT terms,conditions & specifications. These firms did not agree to some of the clauses as stated above. It was decided by the technical evaluation committee to reject the offers of M/s ABB Ltd. & M/s Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. due to deviations in their offer as stated above and to consider the offer of M/s Megawin Switchgear. CE(E-II) dated 21.1.2003 approved for (i) opening of price bid of the only eligible tenderer ie. M/s Megawin Switchgear and (ii) makes of all the accessories as mentioned by this firm in their offer. Accordingly the price bid of the only eligible tenderer ie M/s Megawin Switchgear was opened on 7.2.2003 in the presence of EE(S-II), EE(C-VI) & Sr. AO(E). M/s Megawin Switchgear had quoted Rs. 1,00,51,242.00.(Nett) for the supply of above said panels. Justification of rates were prepared by comparing the rates offered by this firm in the present tender with last purchase rates offered by another firm ie. M/s Southern Switchgear Ltd. for the same item in store-I division as per S.O. No.82/DP/97-98 dated 25.3.98. The rates offered - 12 -
Image of page 12

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
by M/s Megawin Switchgear in the present tender are 4.09% lower than the last purchase rates. Justification of rates were also checked from IEEMA between the period March’98 to Jan’2003 which shows an increase of 12.165% in cost of switchgears. The rates offered by the firm M/s Megawin Switchgear were therefore considered reasonable and justified. The firm also agrees to all terms & conditions of the NIT. The Finance Deptt. have concurred in the proposal of the deptt. for the purchase of 2 boards of 11KV,1250 Amps. 350 MVA DBB indoor type vacuum switchgears comprising of 13 panels including C&R panels from M/s Megawin Switchgears ,the only eligible tenderer at their quoted cost of Rs. 1,00,51,242.00 (Nett) vide their Dy. No. F.A.-1789 Dated 26.6.03 subject to certain conditions which are replied are as under : S.No. Observations of Finance Clarifications of the Deptt 1. Availability of Funds Funds are available against schemes under budget head E-4-1 2. Certification by the deptt. that the rates computed in the tender are
Image of page 13
Image of page 14
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern