(0.6 marks)
A very good attempt is
made to follow the
required TOC structure.
All sections are included
and layout is consistent
within the table
.
(0.7-marks)
Excellent use of the
TOC structure/format.
All sections are in
included and layout is
clear and consistent
within the table.
(1.0 mark)
Critically reflects on
theory of the ‘specific
environment’ and
applies analysis to
chosen organisation.
ULO3
–
GLO4
(Max 5 marks)
The fundamental
theories and their
application to the
chosen organisation
are not clear.
(0 marks)
The fundamental
theories and their
application to the
chosen organisation
may be slightly unclear
or poorly applied.
(1.25 marks)
The fundamental
theories relevant to this
question and their
application to the
chosen organisation are
provided without
ambiguity
(2.5 marks)
The fundamental theories
relevant to this question
and their application to
the chosen organisation
are clear and quite well-
reasoned.
(3.0 marks)
The fundamental
theories relevant to this
question and their
application to the
chosen organisation are
clear, well-reasoned and
systematic.
(3.5 marks)
The fundamental
theories relevant to
this question and their
application to the
chosen organisation
are clear, systematic
and comprehensive.
(5 marks)
Direct and indirect
quotations using
Deakin Harvard
referencing style
ULO2
–
GLO2
(Max 1 marks)
No quotations included
and/or most entries
not compliant with
Harvard referencing
guidelines.
(0 marks)
One of either but not
both direct and indirect
quotations included
and/or are not
compliant with Harvard
referencing guidelines.
(0.25 marks)
Both direct and indirect
quotations included and
are partially compliant
with Harvard referencing
guidelines.
(0.5 marks)
Both direct and indirect
quotations included and
are mostly compliant with
most Harvard referencing
guidelines.
(0.6 marks)
Both direct and indirect
quotations included and
are very compliant with
Harvard referencing
guidelines.
(0.7-marks)
Both direct and
indirect quotations
included and in-text
citations are
completely error free
.
(1.0 marks)
Reference list of
sources suitable to use
in this task and planned
for the Final Report
using
Deakin
Harvard
referencing style
ULO1
–
GLO1
ULO2
–
GLO2
(Max 3 marks)
No academic journal
articles relating to the
tasks and/or reference
list not included or
most entries not
compliant with most
Harvard referencing
guidelines.
(0 marks)
Fewer than three
academic journal
articles relate well to
the tasks and/or
reference list is not
compliant with many of
the Harvard referencing
guidelines.
(0.75 marks)
Fewer than four journal
articles relate
satisfactorily to the task
and reference list mostly
complies with Harvard
guidelines. Suitable
organisational source
and text included.
(1.5 marks)
At least four journal
articles relate well to the
task and reference list is
compliant with mainly the
Harvard guidelines.


You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 9 pages?
- One '14
- Business, Management