Materials submitted for technical judging cannot be

This preview shows page 90 - 94 out of 255 pages.

Materials submitted for technical judging cannot be returned and will not be available at NLC.
Image of page 90

Subscribe to view the full document.

Business Professionals of America Workplace Skills Assessment Program Material contained in this publication may be reproduced for member and/or event use only. September 1, 2016 Page | 91 Economic Research Individual (S) (155) Judge Number Contestant Number ________________ Technical Scoring Rubric Contestant Violated the Copyright and/or Fair Use Guidelines Yes (Disqualification) No If yes, please stop scoring and provide a brief reason for the disqualification below: Contestant followed topic Yes No (Disqualification) Items to Evaluate RESEARCH PAPER Below Average Average Good Excellent Points Awarded Contestant submitted the correct information and in the correct format. Individual Entry Form .pdf format (must be keyed, but does not have to be signed for pre-submission) Research Paper .pdf format All points or none are awarded by the technical judge. 10 Comprehension of Topic Demonstrates understanding of subject matter 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Organization and Expansion of Ideas Argument follows logical progression 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Introduction/Summary Logical argument, evidence to support conclusions, compelling summary 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Creativity Diverse resources, creative angle on the issue, originality, inventiveness 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Writing Skills Correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, concise language, sentence structure 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Overall Effectiveness of Research 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 TOTAL TECHNICAL POINTS (130 points maximum) Contestant is required to format research paper according to the Style & Reference Manual .
Image of page 91
Business Professionals of America Workplace Skills Assessment Program Material contained in this publication may be reproduced for member and/or event use only. September 1, 2016 Page | 92 Economic Research Individual (S) (155) Judge Number Contestant Number ________________ Presentation Scoring Rubric Evaluation of Oral Presentation Below Average Average Good Excellent Points Awarded Opening and summary 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Content of presentation 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Effectiveness of presentation: Voice projection, transitions, flow, stage presence, etc. 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Answers to j udges’ questions 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 TOTAL PRESENTATION POINTS (80 points maximum) Specification Points Rubric SPECIFICATION POINTS: All points or none per item are awarded by the proctor per contestant, not per judge. Points Awarded Set-up lasted no longer than three (3) minutes 5 points Presentation lasted no longer than seven (7) minutes 5 points 10 Documentation submitted at time of check-in: Keyed and signed Individual Entry Form (1 copy) and Research Paper (1 copy) Must have copies for preliminaries and finals 10 Word processed Research Paper and Works Cited page(s) followed the Style & Reference Manual 10 TOTAL SPECIFICATION POINTS (30 points maximum) TOTAL MAXIMUM POINTS = 240 PRESENTATION WILL BE STOPPED AT SEVEN MINUTES
Image of page 92

Subscribe to view the full document.

Business Professionals of America Workplace Skills Assessment Program Material contained in this publication may be reproduced for member and/or event use only.
Image of page 93
Image of page 94
  • Fall '17
  • Jackson
  • Work

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern