Understanding of financial sys worst performing a 50

Info icon This preview shows pages 143–147. Sign up to view the full content.

Understanding of financial sys Worst-performing Attributes >50 30-50 20-30 10-20 <10 Share price growth rate 3.4000 0% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% B Reasonable Score 4.5000 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% A COMPANY A Score 3.2500 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% B Reasonable Score 4.4000 60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% A COMPANY A Score >30% 20-30 10-20 <10 Steady ROI 3.5000 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% B Reasonable Score 4.9000 90.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% A COMPANY A Score >15% 10-15% 5-10% <5% Steady Profit growth rate 2.0000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% B Reasonable Score >30% 20-30 10-20 <10 Steady Capital growth rate 3.0000 20.0% 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 30.0% A COMPANY A Score 2.0000 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% B Reasonable Score 0.0% >70% 3.2000 10.0% 60.0% 30.0% 0.0% A COMPANY A Score Score 50-70% 30-50% 15-30% <15% Average debt rate Best-performing Attributes Table 5-13 Details of scores of the best and worst five competitive attributes under the financial competency factor
Image of page 143

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

129 5.1.7 Market Share The competitive performance of Company A in the ‗market share‘ factor is graphically represented in Figure 5.6. As listed in Table 5.15, Company A had high scores in a number of competitive criteria including: ‗consumer satisfaction with the property sales ‘ (Company A score: 0.1108; reasonable score: 0.0762; maximum score: 0.1535) and ‗property sales strategy and implementation‘ (Company A score: 0.1266; reasonable score: 0.1228; maximum score: 0.1680). Figure 5-6 Radar diagram representing the competitive attributes score of Company A in the ‘market share’ factor 0.1474 0.1511 0.1535 0.1716 0.1680 0.0824 0.1352 0.0762 0.1550 0.1228 0.0572 0.1309 0.1108 0.1171 0.1266 Localisation Market coverage Land acquisition strategy & implementation Sales strategy & implementation Consumer satisfaction with the property sales Maxi. score Reasonable score Company A
Image of page 144
130 However, Company A performed poorly in ‗market coverage‘ (Company A score: 0.0572; reasonable score: 0.0824; maximum score: 0.1474) as well as ‗land acquisition strategy and implementation‘ (Company A score: 0.1171; reasonable score: 0.1550; maximum score: 0.1716). Tables 5.15 and 5.16 tabulate the score of Company A in each of the competitive criteria and attributes under the ‗market share‘ factor. This shows that Company A performs well in ‗growth rate of sales price of the property in similar type‘ (1.5561), ‗coverage of property development market in the region‘ (1.3187), ‗gross area of the property in sales compared to others in the region‘ (1.1786), ‗total amount of sales compared to others in the region (1.1786) and ‗the average property sales rate‘ (1.1493). Despite this, Company A has room for improvement in a number of competitive attributes, including: land market coverage at the national level (0.5000), market coverage of the rental and sale of industrial buildings at the regional level (0.5000), variations between sales estimates and actual sales volume (0.4822), land market coverage at the international level (0.4375), and land market coverage in other provinces (0.4000).
Image of page 145

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

131 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 No.
Image of page 146
Image of page 147
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern