7SECTION: Reading Response Paper #2Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores(2014). After reading excerpts from this case, answer the followingprompt: How do you think Marx (or a Marxist) would interpret the Supreme Court’sHobbyLobbydecision? The paper needs to be 1-2 double spaced pages. You will turn in a hardcopy ofthe paper to your Teaching Assistant during your section meeting. Late papers will not beaccepted.3/24Law’s Relationship to Society III: The Theoretical Tradition of Emile DurkheimErickson, Kai. 1963.Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance.New York: John Wileyand Sons (read selected excerpts).3/26Law’s Relationship to Society IV: Critical Legal StudiesCarbado, Devon W., and Daria Roithmayr. 2014. “Critical Race Theory Meets Social Science.”Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 149-167.SECTION: Reading Quiz #5Rakoff, Jed S. 2014. “Why Innocent People Plead Guilty,”The New York Review of Books,November 20.Swartz, Robert, and Michael M. Baylson. 2014. “Plea Bargains & Prosecutors: An Exchange,”The New York Review of Books, December 18.3/31Law’s Relationship to Society V: InstrumentalismDuggan, Paul. 2007. “Lawyer Who Wiped Out D.C. Ban Says It’s About Liberties, Not Guns,”Washington Post, March 18.Swift, Aisling. 2008. “Naples Man Behind Major Supreme Court Decision Plays as Hard as HeWorks,”Naples Daily, June 26.Liptak, Adam. 2010. “Justices Offer Receptive Ear to Business Interests,” New York Times,December 18.4/2Civil Rights Litigation: Guest Speaker: Stephen Wasby, Professor Emeritus,University at Albany (SUNY)Belton, Robert (as edited by Stephen L. Wasby). 2014. “HowGriggsCame to Be.”Journal ofSupreme Court History39: 425-443.SECTION: Reading/Film Quiz #6Watch the filmThe Road to Brownprior to section().4/7Can Law Change Society? School Desegregation IStrum, Phillipa. 2014. “‘We Always Tell Our Children They are Americans’:Mendez v. Westminsterand the Beginning of the End of School Segregation.”Journal of Supreme Court History39: 307-328.