Solution.
This is Cantor’s other diagonal proof. We write the pairs of natural numbers
in a grid
(1
,
1)
(1
,
2)
(1
,
3)
(1
,
4)
· · ·
(2
,
1)
(2
,
2)
(2
,
3)
(2
,
4)
· · ·
(3
,
1)
(3
,
2)
(3
,
3)
(3
,
4)
· · ·
(4
,
1)
(4
,
2)
(4
,
3)
(4
,
4)
· · ·
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
and proceed down the “antidiagonals” (which run from northeast to southwest) in turn,
giving the list
(1
,
1)
,
(1
,
2)
,
(2
,
1)
,
(1
,
3)
,
(2
,
2)
,
(3
,
1)
,
(1
,
4)
,
(2
,
3)
,
(3
,
2)
,
(4
,
1)
. . .
5(a).
Compute 3
43
(mod 8) using Euler’s theorem.
Solution.
First,
φ
(8) = 4.
(This is the number of numbers less than 4 and having
no factor in common with it, which are 1
,
3
,
5
,
7.)
Euler’s theorem states that
a
φ
(
n
)
≡
1
(mod
n
) whenever
a
and
n
have no common factor. Since 3 and 8 have no common factor,
this gives us 3
4
≡
1
(mod 8). (You could check this explicitly, since 3
4
= 81.) Thus
3
43
= (3
4
)
10
(3
3
)
≡
3
3
(mod 8)
and 3
3
= 27; the answer is the remainder when 27 is divided by 8, which is 3.
5(b).
Why can Fermat’s little theorem not be used in part (a)?
Solution.
Fermat’s little theorem only applies when the modulus is prime. 8 is not prime.
6.
Bank identification numbers consist of nine digits
n
1
, n
2
, . . . , n
9
, such that
7
n
1
+ 3
n
2
+ 9
n
3
+ 7
n
4
+ 3
n
5
+ 9
n
6
+ 7
n
7
+ 3
n
8
+ 9
n
9
≡
0
(mod 10)
.
Consider the bank identification number
211
X
72946
where
X
is a missing digit. What is
X
?
Solution.
Putting the claimed bank identification number into the formula, we get
7
·
2 + 3
·
1 + 9
·
1 + 7
·
x
+ 3
·
7 + 9
·
2 + 7
·
9 + 3
·
4 + 9
·
6
≡
0
(mod 10)
.
Doing the arithmetic gives 194 + 7
x
≡
0
(mod 10). So 7
x
≡
6
(mod 10); that is, 7
x
is
six more than a multiple of 10. A multiple of 7 which is six more than a multiple of 7 is
56 = 7
·
8, which can be found by trial and error; the answer is
x
= 8.
2
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
7.
Explain in a few sentences the major steps of the proof that positive integers have
unique prime factorizations.
Solution.
There are many ways to answer this, but what I had in mind was something
like the following. Assume there are positive integers that do not have unique prime factor
izations. Then there is a smallest integer with two or more prime factorizations; call it
n
.
This is the end of the preview.
Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Summer '09
 Lugo
 Math, Solution., Bank identification number, prime factorizations

Click to edit the document details