One day, while going out for a stroll, Mme. Loisel coincidentally runs into into Mme. Forestier. She approaches her old companion, and Mme. Forestier nearly doesn't recognize her. In a sudden burst of feeling, Madame Loisel uncovers her whole story of losing the jewelry, replacing it, and working off the cost of the substitution from that time (Douglas, 2018). Accordingly, Madame Forestier answers that the first necklace did not contain real diamonds yet rather counterfeit diamonds, which means the first necklace count not cost above 500 francs.AnalysisAs a writer in the nineteenth century France, Maupassant writes in a style called Literary Realism. The best case of this style comes in the third part of the story, when he depicts poor people, working existences of the Loisels (Douglas, 2018). Maupassant stands out this from the relatively sentimental portrayal of the gathering that the Loisels go to, at which Mathilde wore the main jewelry. In the writing, the writer employs a number of literary devices such as:
SymbolsGiven the role it plays in the entire story, the necklace is an imperative image. The phony diamond is a representation of deception. Amid the night of the party, Mathilde spruced up in costly clothes, sparkling embellishments and got away from her once humble life. She was only pretending to lead a life that generally she didn't have.Also, the diamond necklace speaks to the fantasy of riches that Madame Forestier, and the highborn class as a rule, indulge in. While Madame Forestier knew the diamond was phony, she didn't tell Mathilde on the grounds that she appreciated the illusion of lending generously a costly thing and appearing to be wealthy. Individuals regularly respect the wealthy ones, distinguished class, yet are individuals in amazement of the actual money they have in their pockets or the illusion of being rich which they need others to accept.Situational IronySituational Irony gave the story a plot twist which influenced the theme. In the short storyMathilide stated, "I-I-I have lost Mme. Forester's precious stone accessory" (pg.4). This is a case of situational irony since it implies she lost the necklace. The circumstance this places them in was amusing in light of the fact that she was simply having a ton of fun at the ball and now she lost an exceptionally costly neckband. Her being discontent facilitated to her borrowing the necklace which she lost. Another case was that the necklace was a phony and worth scarcely anything (pg.5). They had strayed into the debt for no apparent reason. The accessory was a phony, so now Mme. Foresterhas a genuine, expensive diamond necklace that Mathilide had purchased. It was a fake jewelry that she lost. The irony is that they purchased a jewelry that was a genuine one when they just lost a phony one. Being discontent with their circumstance made
them replace the phony jewelry with a genuine one for a large amount of money. The situational irony demonstrated the issues that originated from dissatisfaction.
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 9 pages?