discharge their mandates must be strength-
ened;
•
criteria and standards for the assessment and
the evaluation of the performance of the inde-
pendent institutions must be developed;
•
the ability of the parliamentary committees and
the Office of the President to oversee the inde-
pendent institutions and analyse their reports
must be strengthened; and
•
procedures to follow-up on the recommenda-
tions contained in the reports of the indepen-
dent institutions must be implemented.
TRANSFORMATION OF PUBLIC SECTOR
INSTITUTIONS
Our public institutions must be more accountable
and responsible for performance and service
delivery; and we must simplify and modernise pro-
cesses, structures and tools, while separating key
institutional functions and consolidating others, to
improve service delivery.
Performance Management
The Public Service must meet rising public expec-
tations by delivering faster results and must provide
public officers with the necessary modern tools and
policies that improves service delivery and creates
public value.
Moreover, it
must recognise produc-
tivity and reward creative ideas and
practices
, while adhering to the prin-
ciples of merit, competency, flexibility
and fairness as it seeks to meet the
diverse needs of its stakeholders.
The transformation that is required
is to a system that rewards desirable
behaviours and penalises negative
ones, including a policy that
exits per-
sistent underperformers.
Also import-
ant is the development of a
formal
succession planning model
and a
new job classification scheme
for
the public service.
To improve the overall effectiveness of the State, a
performance management framework that moni-
tors and evaluates service delivery and implemen-
tation across all sectors, that efficiently allocates
financial and human resources and links them to
strategic plans and institutional performance must
be established. Such a framework would enable
the measurement and assessment of outcomes
against targets and provide early-warning of prob-
lems and support corrective actions to address
underperformance. As such, the performance
management framework would consist of key per-
formance indicators, targets, reports for measuring
and assessing those indicators, as well as taking
corrective actions and rewarding performance. The
system would be supported by the availability of
timely and high-quality data and the systematic
training of officers to prepare them for work. In the
short term, the Ministerial Performance Manage-
ment System (MPMS) that was ended in 2010, after
two years in operation, will be re-introduced. The
MPMS will measure the performance of Ministries
against their own Ministry plans.
RATIONALISING AND MODERNISING
STRUCTURES
Modern processes and structures are crucial to
improving public sector performance. In many
instances, this requires the separation or con-
solidation of functions and the reduction of over-
lapping roles in public institutions. Moreover, it
requires the radical redesign of public services to

Subscribe to view the full document.

- Fall '19