–
Much more on incentives next week
•
Managerial attention
–
Warren Buffett is a serial acquirer but somehow has
committed not
to pay much attention to his
acquisitions – he lets his managers operate without
much interference.
–
Seems somewhat unique in this – very difficult to
avoid the temptation to meddle
32

33
Some arguments to be skeptical of
•
“Mergers diversify shareholders’ portfolios”
–
People often argue that a merger will reduce risk
through diversification
–
In well-functioning capital markets, however,
shareholders can do this themselves
–
i.e. if business
A
is pro-cyclical and business
B
is
anti-cyclical, an investor could buy shares of both
without them merging
–
Financial diversification will generally be much less
costly than a merger

34
Some arguments to be skeptical of
•
“I am good at identifying undervalued firms”
–
In this case, the price they will pay will be less than
their expected profits.
–
But do we really
think they have better information
than all other potential investors?
–
Overwhelming evidence from psychology, finance,
etc. that managers tend to be overconfident in their
own judgment.

35
An argument that needs clarification
•
“The merger will create $X in synergies”
–
On its own, a vacuous claim
–
Essentially saying the merger will increase revenues
or lower costs …
–
Always be sure to clarify what exactly the
“synergies” are

36
Managerial incentives for mergers
•
Our discussion has been framed as: when do mergers
increase shareholder value
•
A different question: when do mergers make CEOs
happy?
•
Since corporate governance is generally weak, we
would expect private incentives to play a role

37
Managerial incentives for mergers
•
Possible incentives:
–
Like running larger companies
–
Like to be on the cover of magazines
–
Want to diversify away personal risk (legal limits on
ability to hedge in financial markets)
–
Want to ensure firm’s survival to protect own job /
human capital
–
Want to ensure growth so that subordinates can
continue moving up the ladder

38
Managerial incentives for mergers
•
We would expect these incentives to play a large role in
mergers...
–
Where merging companies are unrelated
–
Where target companies are growing fast
–
Where managers have performed poorly in the past
•
Morck, Shleifer and Vishny show that exactly these
kinds of mergers tend to lead to adverse stock market
reaction at announcement

39
What does the empirical evidence show?
•
Mergers on average create shareholder value (at least a little)
•
All of the gains accrue to target firms (acquiring firms may
actually lose out on average)
•
This evidence comes mainly from event studies, but is
supported by studies of profitability. Long-run stock market
performance provides some contrary evidence.


You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 43 pages?
- Fall '15
- Economics, Economies Of Scale, Economics of production, Ronald Coase