their own benefits, they must of course pay attention to corporate governance, intervene incorporate governance, and even adhere to corporate governance-oriented investment strategies.Without the above institutional environment, it is difficult for institutional investors to trulybecome active corporate governance investors. For example, in terms of the number of sharesheld, institutional investors in the United States are the second in the world, while the UnitedKingdom is the number one in the world. However, due to the lack of a similar institutionalenvironment, institutional investors in the United Kingdom are basically passive investors.Actively intervene in the corporate governance structure, mainly using foot voting, which haslimited influence in the general meeting of shareholders.Can stones from other mountains be used for jade? Can Chinese institutional investors play therole of American investors? With the development of my country's capital market, institutionalinvestors are in a stage of vigorous development. However, due to the three reasons ofinsufficient growth of institutional investors, lack of institutional environment, and too largemajor shareholders, it is still difficult for them to make a difference in corporate governance.From the perspective of institutional investors themselves, most of them are comprehensivefunds, whose scale and share in the stock market are still relatively small, their own corporategovernance structure is not very standardized, and they have not formed a unique operating style
