39 Vazquez M Ignacio RS 2008 Photovoltaic module reliability model based on

39 vazquez m ignacio rs 2008 photovoltaic module

This preview shows page 27 - 31 out of 63 pages.

39 Vazquez, M., Ignacio, RS (2008), “Photovoltaic module reliability model based on field degradation studies,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 16, pg. 422; Sample, T. (2011), “Failure modes and degradation rates from field-aged crystalline silicon modules”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), US. 40 It should be noted that the high derating factor utilized in the low LCOE case is based on NASA estimates for temperate regions with high peak sun hours, and hence is not applicable to Singapore conditions. In other words, the low LCOE case is illustrative and very unlikely to be attainable under Singapore’s meteorological conditions. See Appendix A for a more detailed explanation on derating factors.
Image of page 27
21 Figure 10 LCOE for the low, base, and high case (@ 5% and 10% discount rate) Note: Base case assumptions are 13.5% for module efficiency, 69.2% for derating factor, 60% for module cost/investment cost ratio, 0.75% annual degradation rate. Low case assumptions are 15% for module efficiency, 77% for derating factor, 70% for module cost/investment cost ratio, 0.5% annual degradation rate. High case assumptions are 12% for module efficiency, 61.4% for derating factor, 50% for module cost/investment cost ratio, 1% annual degradation rate. Module cost is assumed to be US$2.5/Wp in 2010. 31.17 43.51 41.41 57.52 57.30 79.21 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 LCOE (2010 S¢/kWh) 5% discount rate 10% discount rate 2010 Electricity tariffs S23.48¢/kWh Low Base High Low Base High
Image of page 28