compulsive disorder than it is of GAD (Wells, 2000). The SCARED-R incorporates obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms to a greater extent than the PSWQ-C scale, which may in part explain this difference in results.1111231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254
Subscribe to view the full document.
METACOGNITIONS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTSStudy 2The second study is one of few that explore metacognitions in children as young as seven years, and it is the first to do so using the MCQ-C30. Furthermore, it expands the findings from Study 1 by including children with clinical levels of anxiety. The MCM of GAD for children is tested by comparing a group of children with GAD, a group of children with anxiety disorders otherthan GAD (Oth.AD) and a non-clinical control group of children. Based on theory, we expect to find that children with GAD have more negative beliefs about worry than both non-clinical children, and children with other anxiety disorders. Furthermore, as allmetacognitive processes play a role in the development and maintenance of emotional disorders in adults, we expected that anxious (Oth.AD) children should endorse more metacognitive beliefs thannon-anxious children. Previous findings offer conflicting results in respect to differences in metacognitive processes in clinically anxious and non-anxious youth (Bacow et al., 2010; Cartwright-Hatton et al., 2004). Additionally, studies including childhood and adolescent samples have not, as the theory suggests, been able to differentiate GAD samples from samples with other anxiety disorders (Bacow, et al., 2010; Ellis & Hudson, 2011). In accordance with the metacognitivetheory of adult GAD, we hypothesized that (a) there would be no significant differences between levels of positive meta-beliefs between the clinical and non-clinical children, and (b) that the GAD group would endorse significantly more negative metacognitive beliefs than the Oth.AD group and the non-clinical group. MethodsParticipants.Children with anxiety disorders aged 7-13 years, who were recruited for a randomized treatment project were also enrolled in the present project. Control children without disorders were 1212255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278
METACOGNITIONS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTSselected to resemble the clinical sample. The project enrolled 99 families between February 18th, 2009 and July 20th, 2012. Six families were excluded from the main data analysis because of missing data on the MCQ-C30. Participants in the final data set (N = 93) ranged in age from 7 to 12 years, and had a mean age of 9 years and 9.36 months (SD= 1 year and 7.68 months), and 46 (49.5%) of the participants were girls. Children as young as seven years old were sampled because at this age many children are capable of the metacognition required by the MCM. Adolescents above age 13 years were not included as the sample came from a larger clinical trial focused on children. All participants had at least one native Danish-speaking parent. School psychologists, physicians, or parents referred clinical participants to the study.
As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.
Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern
I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.
University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern
The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.