One question now being raised concerns whether the division of the life course intothree stages is still functional. Not only are people living longer, they are also healthier than inthe past. Most older people have no serious disabilities, and many remain active well into their80s (Manton and Land, 2000). Why, then, can’t older people learn new skills so that they cancontinue to contribute to society? In fact, recent trends show that people are no longer retiringpermanently from their career jobs. Rather many older people scale down their work hours ortake a different type of job rather than leaving the workforce entirely (Giandrea et al., 2007).That reduces the burden on public benefits and allows society to take advantage of the olderworkers’ skills and knowledge. Today, there are serious proposals to reduce age differentiationand spread education, work, and leisure over the entire life course.Over the past few decades, research incorporating the life course perspective hasemphasized that aging is a dynamic process that must be studied in a historical and socialcontext and that age, period, and cohort effects shape the aging experience for individuals andsocial groups (Ferraro et al., 2009). Although much of the research on the life courseemphasizes modal patterns, large numbers of people do not fit these patterns. Rather, thepath through life is quite heterogeneous, challenging the idea that there is an“institutionalized” life course (O’Rand, 1996). There is also much to be learned about how the