100%(9)9 out of 9 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 4 pages.
“The conclusion of this argument is that all witches have long noses” This statement can’t be proven as “are there really witches”
2. Albert is angry with me so he probably won't be willing to help me wash the dishes. “Not an argument”3. If the road wasn't icy, the car wouldn't have slid off the road. The conclusion of this argument is that cars wouldn’t slid if the roads weren’t ice. Not all cars slid on icy roads. 4. Albert isn't a fireman and he isn't a fisherman either. “Not an argument”LO 4: Mode(s) of InquiryDetermine whether or not the following arguments are valid by using the informal test of validity. IF the argument is invalid, provide a counterexample.1. Bob is a fireman. Therefore, Bob has put out fires. This argument is invalid as Bob could be a newfirefighter and have not yet put out a fire. Bob is a firefighter who is trained and ready toput out fires. 2. Bob is taller than Susan. Susan is taller than Frankie. Therefore Bob, is taller than Frankie. Valid argument3. Craig loves Linda. Linda loves Monique, Therefore Craig loves Monique. This argument is invalid because it does not tell us if Craig is acquainted with Monique. Since Craig and Linda love each other we can only assure the he will also love Monique also. LO 5: Evidence and FindingsSupply the missing premise or premises needed in order to make the following arguments valid. Try to make thepremises as plausible as possible while making the argument valid (which is to apply the principle of charity).1. Ed rides horses. Therefore, Ed is a cowboy.