Course Hero Logo

Stated that the literature review was good but

Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. This preview shows page 7 - 9 out of 12 pages.

stated that “the literature review was good but however, if you paid attention to previous emailsand information then she would have seen that the article she chose was the exact same of hersand that she need to pick another article to do a literature review on.” What precipitated thedemand for work was that finally Samantha had emailed something we thought could helpfinally start piecing together our paper since we were a week away from the due date. The groupresponse to this was shocking that Samantha didn’t pay attention that Judy had already used thatarticle but also for Cassandra and myself we felt the tension between Judy and Samantha more atthis moment after the email Judy sent. Samantha acted out in anger to the email by shutting downsaying that she will not pick a new article and we could use our three and she would rather7
Running Head: Critical Incident Analysisanswer more of our answerable questions and also piece the paper together leaving usresponsible not for only the rigor and merit portion based on our article and interventions. So thisis the way myself, Cassandra, and Judy decided to go about things to keep confusion down in thegroup after seeing Samantha’s response on her mistake of using the same article as Judy. At thetime I felt like that was the best resolution as a group we could of agreed to. And looking back onit now I still feel that was the best choice we could make so that we didn’t set our group back andnot get the assignment turned in on time. My final demand for work was our group fourth meetup together, this was the last meeting we scheduled as a group. At this point we had theanswerable questions completed along with the rigor and merit portion so Samantha piecedeverything together prior to our webcam meet. She also emailed the final copy to every groupmember so that we can double check and make sure as a group we felt the paper was complete.In her email she asked that we all respond by a certain time to give her the okay to submit it tothe instructor she said “if by 3 o’clock she haven’t heard back then she would assume everyonewas okay with the paper and then she will submit it anyways.” Cassandra and myself respondedto her email prior to 3 o’clock to let her know it was good to us and that we will also be in thefinal meeting to talk about how the group assignment went and also close out the group. By thetime we met on webcam Judy was the only person who had never responded to the email nor wasshe at our final meet up. As a group we all was very surprised that Judy had just stoppedparticipating. At the time I couldn’t make sense to why Judy wouldn’t communicate now beingthat her issue with Samantha was that she didn’t have good communication within the group orparticipation initially. So I felt that she was now contradicting herself by not participating in theend of our group. I now look back at this incident and make sense of it as if maybe Judy wastrying to avoid conflict since so much had happened between her and Samantha with Judy8

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

End of preview. Want to read all 12 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
N/A
Tags
Samantha, Group development, Mutual Aid Group, Judy frustration

Newly uploaded documents

Show More

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture