throughout the piece. At the end of the Dialogues he believes that Cleanthes offered the strongest arguments. However, this could be out of loyalty to his teacher, as this does not seem to reflect Hume's own views on the topic. When other pieces on religion by Hume are taken into consideration, it may be noted that they all end with (apparently) ironic statements reaffirming the truth of Christian religious views. While the irony may be less readily evident in the Dialogues, this would suggest a similar reading of this work's ending.(Cicero used a similar technique in his Dialogues.)-Cleanthes is an "experimental theist"—"an exponent of orthodox empiricism"—who bases his beliefs about God's existence and nature upon a version of the teleological argument, which uses evidence of design in the universe to argue for God's existence and resemblance to the human mind.-Philo, according to the predominant view among scholars, "probably represents a viewpoint similar to Hume's own."Philo, along with Demea, attacks Cleanthes' views on anthropomorphism and teleology; while not going as far as to deny the existence of God, Philo asserts that human reason is wholly inadequate to make any assumptions about the divine, whether through a priorireasoning or observation of nature.-Demea "defends the Cosmological argumentand philosophical theism..."He believes that the existence of God should be proven through a priorireasoning and that our beliefs about the nature of God should be based upon revelation and fideism. Demea rejects Cleanthes' "naturalreligion" for being too anthropomorphic. Demea objects to the abandonment of the a priori arguments by Philo and Cleanthes (both of whom are empiricists) and perceives Philo to be "accepting an extreme form of skepticism."
This is the end of the preview.
access the rest of the document.