Running head 6 2 final project milestone three draft

  • No School
  • AA 1
  • CHazel32
  • 6
  • 82% (17) 14 out of 17 people found this document helpful

This preview shows page 4 - 6 out of 6 pages.

Running Head: 6-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Draft Final Project II: Bioethics4III.ConclusionIn the end the court would here from Dr. Hammesfahr aneurologistand Dr. Maxfield, a radiologist who were retained by Terri’s parent who stated in their opinionTerri was not in a persistent vegetative state and that her brain scan showed some regenerationfrom earlier brain scans in 1996 to the ones from 2002. However Dr. Gambone, a doctor whotreated Terri over the course of several years was quoted as saying “Her brain studies and wavetest show that she has a brain which is predominantly replaced by spinal fluid” (Breed, 2005)After hearing this testimony the .U.S. Supreme Court Ruled in Michaels favor honoring Terri’swishes and ordered the removal of the feeding tube. Terri’s feeding tube was removed on March18, 2005 and she passed away thirteen days later March 31, 2005. This dispute sparked a debateover proper role of government in life-and-death decisions. It also prompted thousands ofAmerican to discuss their end-of-life wishes with family and to create living wills. InWashington, the president said he was saddened by the death. “The essence of civilization is thatthe strong have a duty to protect the weak,” Bush said. “In cases where their ae serious doubtsand questions, the presumption should be in favor of life.” In Rome, Cardinal Jose Saraiva
Martins, head of the Vatican’s office for sainthood, called the removal of the feeding tube “anattack against god.” And Gov. Jeb Bush said that millions of people around the world will be

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture