Camaro to ronnie and linda this is constructive

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Camaro to Ronnie and Linda, this is constructive delivery, making the gift irrevocable. 48-3 // Hadfield v. Gilchrist Facts : Sam Gilchrist owns an automobile towing service and keeps a storage facility for the towed vehicles. Mark Hadfield went to regain his 1988 Lincoln Continental from the loctation his wife parked it. The spot was on private property belonging to Allen Saffer. Saffer called for Gilchrist to tow the Hadfield’s car from the Saffer property. Hadfield called to repossess his car but was told to wait the next day. By the next day, Hadfield arrived with the fees paid to retrieve his vehicle but had found that his car was extremely damaged. Although the storage
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
area was fenced, the hooligans cut through the fence. Hadfield couldn’t get Gilchrist to pay for the damages, and Hadfield ended up selling the car for $1,000. Issue : Was Gilchrist responsible for the damages? What was the appropriate bailment for this issue? Holding : Gilchrist was responsible as a bailee for the $4,035 in damages. Rule of Law : Bailment is the relationship that forms when one person gives the possession of personal property by delivery without transfer of title to a bailee to achieve a certain purpose. In this situation, Gilchrist was responsible for the bailment for mutual benefit. He was also liable for damages made on the vehicle
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

Camaro to Ronnie and Linda this is constructive delivery...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online