Briefly explain why you think your policy falls on

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 5 pages.

Briefly explain why you think your policy falls on that number in the spectrum. Why is this policy pro, con, or neutral? Do parts of the policy take components from both sides of the topic? For example, does it represent a solution that individuals on different sides of the topic might agree upon? Or, does the policy mainly support one perspective?
requirements that it wants to put in place for having a firearm or purchasing a firearm. The perspective they take is a solution that tends to safety ideas for the public and having the fear of guns taken away. It takes consideration that competent people will able to have guns whereas incompetent people are not going to lay their fingers on a gun or firearm. It’s taking into consideration that people who want guns need to show that they are actually able to and use their weapon for proper reasons and to not just blatantly be a nuisance who wields a firearm in public for no reason. The policy is simply wanting to implement a system that allow people who are capable to owning one to have it. Policy 2 Policy name (Precise bill/policy/legislation name): Assault Weapons Policy link (Include a direct link to the policy. Do not use Wikipedia, news articles, etc. Go directly to the source for information): - laws/policy-areas/hardware-ammunition/assault-weapons/ _____ Implementation level (Circle one of the following that fits your policy):

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture