People who want to be involved in proceedings or put

Info icon This preview shows pages 53–59. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
People who want to be involved in proceedings or put certain matters before the court. 2 options: amicus curiae or intervener.
Image of page 53

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Amicus curiae The footing on which an amicus curiae is heard is that that person is willing to offer the Court a submission on law or relevant fact which will assist the Court in a way in which the Court would not otherwise have been assisted…” per Brennan CJ in Levy v Victoria Usually involves public interest litigation. Why?
Image of page 54
Levy v State of Victoria (1997) 189 CLR 579 Regulations made under the Victorian Wildlife Act 1975 and the Conservation, Forests and Lands Act 1987 made it an offence to be within an area set aside for the hunting of game birds at the beginning of the hunting season without a licence. Laurence Levy opposed duck shooting and in June 1994, at the commencement of the duck shooting season, he was charged with being in a hunting area during a prohibited time without a licence.
Image of page 55

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Levy v State of Victoria An amicus will be heard when Court is of opinion that it will be significantly assisted; provided that any cost to the parties or delay is not disproportionate to the assistance that is expected.
Image of page 56
Intervener They become a party, with the burdens associated with it. Interests affected by outcome, but must be >just preferring one outcome over another-concerned about precedent outcome which may be a serious matter for them Statute gives some powers of intervention, eg ACCC, Australian Human Rights Commission, Attorneys-General. All others need to seek leave.
Image of page 57

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Inteveners cf amici curiae Intervener = a nonparty, joins ongoing litigation, either as a matter of right, or at the discretion of the court, without the permission of the original litigants. The basic rationale for intervention is that a judgment in a particular case may affect the rights of nonparties, who ideally should have the right to be heard. Amici Curae = someone, not a party to a case, who volunteers to offer information to assist a court in deciding a matter before it.
Image of page 58
Inteveners & amici curiae in Levy v Vic Interveners: Attorneys-General: Cth, Qld, WA, NSW, SA Fairfax Nationwide News Herald & Weekly Times Channel 7 Amici curiae: Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance Australian Press Council
Image of page 59
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern