horizon generators and k a is the tangent vector to the horizon generators with

# Horizon generators and k a is the tangent vector to

• 40

This preview shows page 16 - 17 out of 40 pages.

horizon generators, and k a is the tangent vector to the horizon generators with respect to λ . The Killing vector ξ a is given on the horizon by ξ a = κλk a (with a certain choice for the origin of λ ). Using the Einstein equation we thus have M = ( κ/ 8 πG ) Z R ab k a k b λ dλdA (2.3) = ( κ/ 8 πG ) Z λ dλdA (2.4) = ( κ/ 8 πG ) Z ( - ρ ) dλdA (2.5) = ( κ/ 8 πG ) ∆ A. (2.6) The second equality uses the focusing equation neglecting the quadratic terms ρ 2 and σ 2 , the third uses integration by parts with the boundary term dropped since the black hole is initially and finally stationary, and the last equality follows directly from the definition of ρ . 2.1.4 Second and Third Laws Continuing with the analogy, the Second Law is of course Hawking’s area theorem, stating that the horizon area can never decrease assuming Cosmic Censorship and a positive energy condition. The Third Law also has an analog in black hole physics, namely, the surface gravity of the horizon cannot be reduced to zero in a finite number of steps. Validity of this law has been suggested by investigations of the orbits of charged test particles around a charged rotating black hole. A precise formulation of this Third Law has been given and proved under some assumptions by Israel. Significance of the Third Law An idea of the significance of the Third Law can be gleaned by thinking about how one might try to violate it. First, for a nonrotating neutral black hole, κ is decreased when mass is added to the hole. (So the hole has negative specific heat.) But it would take an infinite amount of mass to reduce κ to zero. A general rotating, charged black hole with angular momentum J and charge Q has a surface gravity and horizon area given by κ = 4 πμ/A, A = 4 π [2 M ( M + μ ) - Q 2 ] (2.7) with μ = ( M 2 - Q 2 - J 2 /M 2 ) 1 / 2 . (2.8) An extremal black hole is one for which μ = 0. For an extremal black hole, κ vanishes and A = 4 π (2 M 2 - Q 2 ). Thus, an extremal black hole has zero “temperature”, but nonzero “entropy”. (Thus the Planck form of the Third law does not hold for black holes. Also it should be remarked that if the extremal state is “eternal” rather than being reached from a non-extremal one, the entropy that enters a proper variational form of the first law is not the area and, in fact, vanishes.) If M 2 < Q 2 + J 2 /M 2 then the spacetime has a naked singularity and is not a black hole at all. Thus if the surface gravity could actually be reduced to zero, one would be only infinitesimally far from creating a naked singularity, violating Cosmic Censorship. To reduce the surface gravity to zero you might thus try to inject a sufficient amount of charge or angular momentum into the hole. Suppose you try to drop a charge q with mass m into a nonrotating charged black hole of mass M and charge Q < M , trying to make Q + q = M + m . In order for the gravitational attraction to be stronger than the electrostatic repulsion you must choose mM > qQ , so q/m < M/Q . But this inequality insures that Q + q < M + m . Similarly if you try to inject enough orbital angular momentum to a spinning black hole you find that the particle simply misses the hole.  • • • 