The federalists argued that a bill of rights was not

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

7. The Federalists argued that a Bill of Rights was not necessary because (Points : 1)all basic protections were contained in the Constitution.the anti-Federalists were being irrational.
it impedes the authority of the government.it would take too long to ratify.
8. The weaknesses of the Articles of Confederationwere dramatized by all of the following except(Points : 1)
9. The Virginia Plan proposed all of the following except(Points : 1)
10. The Bill of Rights, as a whole, protects states’ rights because (Points : 1)
Time Remaining:

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture