{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Chapter 12 - Solution Manual

The result would be a decline in liquidity measures

Info iconThis preview shows pages 2–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The result would be a decline in liquidity measures, such as the current ratio and working capital. The deferred tax increase would increase long-term liabilities. At the same time net income would decrease by the amount of depreciation expense and by the amount of the deferred tax liability increase. The effect would be to increase the debt to equity ratio. The decrease in net income would result in a decline in EPS. Ignoring depreciation expense on the acquired asset, the following differences in EPS would occur: EPS - Postpone purchase:($200,000 - 80,000)/55,500 = $ 2.16 EPS - purchase in 2006: ($200,000 -100,000)/55,500 1.80 Decline in EPS $ 0.36 Not only would EPS decline if the purchase were made, but it would fall below the prior year EPS, $1.95. The company would no longer display the historic steadily increasing EPS. d. The company would continue to project a steadily increasing EPS if the purchase were postponed. Although the EPS would be historically correct, i.e., representationally faithful, the projections implied by it may mislead potential investors, particularly, if next year is no better, or is even worse than 2010. The ethical dilemma is that a company should not base economic decisions on financial statement effects. Rather, the financial statements should portray economic reality regardless of what that reality is. Case 12-2 a. There is no clear solution to this exercise, it can be used to generate class discussion about the qualitative criteria. The following represents the opinion of the authors. Nondiscounting Discounting Neither (1) (2) (3) 1. Relevance X a. Timeliness X b. Predictive &
Background image of page 2

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
256 feedback value X 2. Reliability X a. Representational Faithfulness X b. Verifiability & neutrality X 3. Understandability X 4. Comparability X b.i. Relevance. Because the objective of financial statements is to provide decision relevant information, discounted deferred taxes may be more relevant than nondiscounted deferred taxes. The FASB has determined that the asset liability approach measures future tax consequences. It follows that deferred tax liabilities measure future cash outflows. Consistent with liability measurements of other future expected cash outflows the present value of the expected future tax consequences has decision usefulness and is therefore relevant. a. Timeliness. The concept of timeliness, as a qualitative criterion, means that the information provided in financial statements is presented within a time frame to be decision relevant. The measurement method (discounting vs nondiscounting) does not affect the timeliness of either approach. b. Predictive and feedback value. If we believe that deferred taxes are future tax consequences, and that they should be measured in a manner that is consistent with other liabilities in order to be decision relevant, then it follows that discounting provides better predictive and feedback value because it provides an appropriate measure of actions taken and as such should improve decision maker abilities to
Background image of page 3
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page2 / 23

The result would be a decline in liquidity measures such as...

This preview shows document pages 2 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online