CLEP Microeconomic Notes 1

When several competitors agree to raise the price of

Info icon This preview shows pages 14–16. Sign up to view the full content.

- when several competitors agree to raise the price of a product – results in a higher price than the market can bear (a.i.2) Price Discrimination - when a firm charges two parties different prices for the exact same product or service 138) Potential Entrant Effect - when the potential of a new competitor drives businesses to efficiency and lower prices for the consumer a.i) Conglomerate Mergers can be challenged on the basis of “Potential Entrant Effect” if: (a.i.1) The threat of potential entrant influenced the industry (a.i.2) Company could have entered the market without the merger taking place (a.i.3) The number of potential entrants is small a.ii) The problem with mergers and acquisitions is it can eliminate the potential entrant effect 139) Group Boycotts – per se violations of the Sherman Act of 1890 – occurs when a group of companies pressure a manufacturer to terminate its relationship with one company a) Definitions a.i) Group Boycott – because of pressure from many retailers, a manufacturer decides to not longer sell to an individual retailer a.ii) Refusal to deal – a manufacturer decides to no longer sell to a retailer 140) Market Division –is when competitors in the same industry divide up a large territory into segments, a) Restricts customers access to a free market a.i) by dividing the territories they create monopolies a.ii) a per se violation of the Sherman Act of 1890, a.iii) Also known as Horizontal Territorial Limitations 141) Monopolistic Competition is the most prominent type of market structure in the United States a) Monopolistic competition is inefficient due to excess capacity a.i) Ex: a restaurant that is only busy at lunch a.ii) Produces less output than perfect competition and the output it produces is at a higher price b) In the long Run a monopolistic competitor will make normal profits (economic profits are zero in the long run) similar to a perfect competitor b.i)With one difference: (b.i.1) Monopolistic Competition: Price (P) = Average Total Cost (ATC) NOT at Minimum (b.i.2) Perfect competition: Price (P) = Average Total Cost (ATC) at the Minimum b.ii) Since monopolistic competition is inefficient (b.ii.1) Price (P) is greater than Marginal Cost (MC) (b.ii.2) Goods and services are priced at a higher level than the cost to produce 142) Game Theory – a mathematical analysis of the strategic moves and counter-moves that occur in an oligopoly market 143) Cartel – multiple firms acting together as one firm a) Example of Cartel - OPEC – group of 11 major oil producing countries who attempt to control oil prices by limiting production a.i) Eliminates competitive pricing a.ii) Increases the firms price/profits
Image of page 14

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

(a.ii.1) Cartels were made illegal in the U.S by the Sherman Act of 1890 a.iii) Cartels are not stable since there are incentives within a cartel to “cheat” 144) Imperfect Competition is inefficient – (a.i.1) they can survive unlike Perfect Competition, efficiency is a requirement for long-term survival (a.i.2) produce output level where the Price (P) is greater than Marginal Cost (MC) (a.i.2.a)
Image of page 15
Image of page 16
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern