In a sense before sociology people knew well that they were acted upon by a

In a sense before sociology people knew well that

This preview shows page 24 - 27 out of 30 pages.

In a sense, before sociology, people knew well that they were acted upon by a force greater than themselves during these sacred times and in these sacred places. But what they did not know well is by what. So they posited a mystical forces represented by the totem or some such sacred symbol. Then there is the totem as the flag of the clan: religion as representing the clan to itself Religion is the way society represents itself to itself and conveys its own power. And all that represents society to itself, in modern as well as pre-modern societies, remains in a crucial way religious and sacred. Examples: The soldier who dies for his flag, dies for his country, but he has the flag first place in his consciousness. Take the Danish cartoons of Mohammad or the Charlie Hebdo cartoons: Why do they prompt such reaction?
In the sixties, radicals burning flags infuriated many/most Americans: why? In this second form, Durkheim saw the eternal role of religion o Symbolic basis of all social life How are these collective forces brought under the totem? How do these external forces, the effervescent powers of the collective experience, come to be thought of under the form of totems? The key is in the power of a SYMBOL? The complicated is made simple by the symbol. The symbol distills, subsumes, simplifies a complicated emotional and collective experience. The collective effervescence is capsuled by the figurative representation of the totem. And where ever it appears, strong echoes of the power follow ready to kickoff another collective effervescence. Big conclusion: We are social animals because we are symbolic animals. No symbol, no society! Return to Materialism versus Idealism: Marx contra Durkheim Marx Weber - Dates to orient yourself o Marx, 1818-1883 o Durkheim, 1858-1917 o Simmel 1858-1918 o Freud,1856-1939 o Weber, Max 1864-1920 o Characters in Weber’s protestant ethic Martin Luther 1483–1546: In 1517 he posted his 95 theses inviting debate—as good a mark of the beginning of the Reformation as any. John Calvin (1509-1564) Richard Baxter (1615-1691) Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) - Weber’s Bio o Foot in father’s world—pre-modern aristocratic Mom—liberal modern capitalism Father was a politician Very macho, status world Torn between the two—early ages tried to follow father
Dependent upon opium—very depressed from not reconciling with father before he died after fight over mistreatment of his mother - What is capitalism o Big question: why and how did modern western capitalism come about and why first only in Europe? To answer, must answer what is capitalism? o For Marx-- > commodification of labor o Weber says that modern capitalism is the Continual, rational, predictable pursuit of profit o This is an important thing to keep in mind because it will distinguish the modern capitalism from early varieties: the continuous, methodical, sustained, rational, pursuit of profits o This differentiates it from booty capitalism or adventure capitalism or even mercantile capitalism o We also need to distinguish the capitalism that Marx and Weber were

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture