{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Criminology Lecture Notes2

Broken window theory disorder breakdown of control

Info iconThis preview shows pages 8–10. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Broken window theory: Disorder Breakdown of Control High Crime . Model tells us to focus on drunks, hookers, etc. . “They will use the streets less often, and when on the streets will stay apart from their fellows, moving with averted eyes, silent lips, and hurried steps. ‘Don’t get involved.’” – people just keep to themselves – constantly being assaulted by panhandlers . In these conditions, need PUBLIC control – responsibility falls on the police (his job is to exercise public control) . Police officer’s duties are too narrowly defined . Propose that it is necessary to allow police to exercise extraordinary measures – must be able to do things to target ordinary social disorders which may not be violating the law – should be out there picking up drunks, chasing panhandlers away – EXPANSION OF POLICE POWERS/DUTIES TO CLEAN UP SOCIAL DISORDERS . Aggressive Patrol . Police officers must be aggressive in patrolling “We Kick Ass” (Wilson and Kelling) . Sampson and Raudenbush . Collective Efficacy: “the linkage of cohesion and mutual trust with shared expectations for intervening in support of neighborhood social control” . Wilson and Kelling predict that Social disorder will directly cause crime . Sampson and Raudenbush find that there is no relationship between social disorder and homicide – Collective efficacy is what affects homicide rate – if one thing goes up, another thing will go down (if collective efficacy goes up, then both social disorder and homicide will decrease) . Spurious relationship between social disorder and homicide – spurious relationship is when two things are related because of one . Sampson and Raudenbush: Collective Efficacy Findings
Background image of page 8

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
. Collective efficacy and social disorder have negative relationship . Collective efficacy and robbery have negative relationship . Social disorder and robbery have positive relationship (if social disorder increases, robbery increases) . Collective efficacy has a far greater impact on crime than social disorder alone . People in communities on the private and parochial level have more power over social disorder than the police . Role of the police in controlling crime is really far less than what we may realize . Most crime control is exercised by regular people (keeping friends in line, locking up property, watching others, etc.) . Police still have a role in maintaining communities Lecture 2/29/2012 . Cohen and Felson: The Routine Activities of Criminals and Victims . Routine Activity theory is more a Ecological theory . Deals with the placement of objects and people in space – it also involves a consideration of people through time – charts where people are in different places – in following people’s schedules in place and time, it identifies those locations and places where a motivated offender and a crime target may meet – finds where their paths would cross . Focus on objects that can be used to perpetrate a crime (ex. Motivated criminal offender utilizes a car in order to commit a crime) (ex. Power tools or kitchen tools)
Background image of page 9
Image of page 10
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}